Literature DB >> 16829595

How should we report on perinatal outcome?

Jolande A Land1.   

Abstract

Authors should report on neonatal outcome after ART in a well-defined and uniform way, to enable readers to compare the outcome of different studies. For reporting on birthweight, SD scores (z-scores) are to be preferred, customized for the most important physiological variables affecting birthweight, e.g. gestational age, gender of the child and whether it is a singleton or part of a multiple. It may be suggested that ESHRE should support the construction of European customized birthweight tables and make available a software for calculating the z-scores in cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829595     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  21 in total

1.  The safety of long-term cryopreservation on slow-frozen early cleavage human embryos.

Authors:  Qinli Liu; Ying Lian; Jin Huang; Xiulian Ren; Ming Li; Shengli Lin; Ping Liu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Michael Tobias; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Kirk P Conrad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  The effect of father's age in fertile, subfertile, and assisted reproductive technology pregnancies: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Mark D Hornstein; Howard Cabral; Daksha Gopal; Hafsatou Diop; Milton Kotelchuck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Impact of hepatitis B virus carrier serostatus on neonatal outcomes after IVF-ET.

Authors:  Shengli Lin; Rong Li; Xiaoying Zheng; Lina Wang; Xiulian Ren; Lixue Chen; Qinli Liu; Ping Liu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  Increased risk of large-for-gestational age birthweight in singleton siblings conceived with in vitro fertilization in frozen versus fresh cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; James P Toner; Charles C Coddington
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort: Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Marlene Anderka; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Victor Y Fujimoto; Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Tarun Jain; Alicia Armstrong; David A Grainger; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Bruce Cohen; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.