Literature DB >> 26772624

Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.

Dara H Sorkin1, Alpesh Amin2, David L Weimer3, Joseph Sharit4, Heather Ladd5, Dana B Mukamel6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Annually more than 3 million people are admitted to one of the 15,965 skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the United States, with 90% of admissions occurring from a hospital. Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes several internet-based report cards, including one for nursing homes (Nursing Home Compare, NHC), they are not widely used. This is due, in part, to the complexity of the information available and the fact that the choice of nursing homes is typically made while in the hospital without access to the web-based NHC. We developed Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) to address these limitations and to improve the decision-making process. METHODS/
DESIGN: This paper describes the design and rationale of a two-arm randomized controlled trial designed to test the effectiveness of NHCPlus compared to usual care only, in a sample of patients being discharged from the hospital to an SNF (N=229). Assessments were conducted within 24h prior to patient discharge and 30-days post discharge. Primary outcomes to be examined included the use of NHC, increased choice of nursing homes with better reported outcomes, and increased distance between patient/family residence and nursing home. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction with the decision to go to a nursing home, confidence in the choice of nursing home, and reduced hospital length of stay. DISCUSSION: NHCPlus is an innovative mobile application designed to allow patients to personalize their choice of nursing homes to meet their medical needs and preferences. The application to other quality report cards is discussed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26772624      PMCID: PMC4818159          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  7 in total

1.  The quest for nursing home quality: learning history's lessons.

Authors:  Gary S Winzelberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

2.  Public reporting drove quality gains at nursing homes.

Authors:  Rachel Werner; Elizabeth Stuart; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Nursing homes' response to the nursing home compare report card.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Lynn Huang; David L Weimer; Ann Dozier
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Simon F Haeder; David L Weimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Elizabeth A Stuart; Edward C Norton; Daniel Polsky; Jeongyoung Park
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.734

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Using contingent valuation to develop consumer-based weights for health quality report cards.

Authors:  David L Weimer; Debra Saliba; Heather Ladd; Yuxi Shi; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Personalizing Nursing Home Compare and the Discharge from Hospitals to Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Heather Ladd; Joseph Sharit; Ran Schwarzkopf; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Hospital Discharge and Selecting a Skilled Nursing Facility: A Comparison of Experiences and Perspectives of Patients and Their Families.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr

4.  The Experience of a Neurocritical Care Admission and Discharge for Patients and Their Families: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Rath; Natalie Kreitzer; Erika Schlichter; Omar Lopez; Simona Ferioli; Laura B Ngwenya; Brandon Foreman
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.627

5.  Length of stay in long-term care facilities: a comparison of residents in six European countries. Results of the PACE cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Danni Collingridge Moore; Sheila Payne; Thomas Keegan; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens; Giovanni Gambassi; Rauha Heikkila; Viola Kijowska; H Roeline Pasman; Lara Pivodic; Katherine Froggatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.