Literature DB >> 17673535

Nursing homes' response to the nursing home compare report card.

Dana B Mukamel1, William D Spector, Jacqueline S Zinn, Lynn Huang, David L Weimer, Ann Dozier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have recently begun publishing the Nursing Home Compare report card. The objective of this study was to examine the initial reactions of nursing homes to publication of the report card and to evaluate the impact of the report card on quality-improvement activities.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of a random national sample of 1,502 nursing home administrators; 724 responded. We analyzed frequency of responses to questions regarding views of the quality measures and actions taken. RESULT: A model of nursing homes' behavior predicted that the report card would provide an incentive for facilities to improve quality. A majority of facilities (69%) reported reviewing their quality scores regularly, and many have taken specific actions to improve quality. Homes with poor quality scores were more likely to take actions following the publication of the report card. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the Nursing Home Compare report card has the potential to positively affect nursing home quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673535     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/62.4.s218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  26 in total

1.  Nursing home price and quality responses to publicly reported quality information.

Authors:  Jan P Clement; Gloria J Bazzoli; Mei Zhao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  CONNECT for quality: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial to improve fall prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  Ruth A Anderson; Kirsten Corazzini; Kristie Porter; Kathryn Daily; Reuben R McDaniel; Cathleen Colón-Emeric
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Public reporting of nursing home quality of care: lessons from the United States experience for canadian policy discussion.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Kellie Draper; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

4.  Association of race and sites of care with pressure ulcers in high-risk nursing home residents.

Authors:  Yue Li; Jun Yin; Xueya Cai; Jna Temkin-Greener; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Is there evidence of cream skimming among nursing homes following the publication of the Nursing Home Compare report card?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-02

6.  National release of the nursing home quality report cards: implications of statistical methodology for risk adjustment.

Authors:  Yue Li; Xueya Cai; Laurent G Glance; William D Spector; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Assessing nursing home care quality through Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Justin Goodson; Wooseung Jang
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-12

8.  Does risk adjustment of the CMS quality measures for nursing homes matter?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Laurent G Glance; Yue Li; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Laura Mosqueda
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The "Nursing Home Compare" measure of urinary/fecal incontinence: cross-sectional variation, stability over time, and the impact of case mix.

Authors:  Yue Li; John Schnelle; William D Spector; Laurent G Glance; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The Effects of Antipsychotic Quality Reporting on Antipsychotic and Psychoactive Medication Use.

Authors:  John R Bowblis; Judith A Lucas; Christopher S Brunt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.