Literature DB >> 21790590

Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

David C Grabowski1, Robert J Town.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the effects of the Nursing Home Quality Initiative (NHQI), which introduced quality measures to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Nursing Home Compare website, on facility performance and consumer demand for services. DATA SOURCES: The nursing home Minimum Data Set facility reports from 1999 to 2005 merged with facility-level data from the On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting System. STUDY
DESIGN: We rely on the staggered rollout of the report cards across pilot and nonpilot states to examine the effect of report cards on market share and quality of care. We also exploit differences in nursing home market competition at baseline to identify the impacts of the new information on nursing home quality.
RESULTS: The introduction of the NHQI was generally unrelated to facility quality and consumer demand. However, nursing homes facing greater competition improved their quality more than facilities in less competitive markets.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of competition in many nursing home markets may help to explain why the NHQI report card effort had a minimal effect on nursing home quality. With the introduction of market-based reforms such as report cards, this result suggests policy makers must also consider market structure in efforts to improve nursing home performance. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21790590      PMCID: PMC3393022          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01298.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  25 in total

1.  Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chou
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes.

Authors:  R A Hirth
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  An overview of nursing homes and their current residents: data from the 1995 National Nursing Home Survey.

Authors:  G W Strahan
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1997-01-23

4.  Do trends in the reporting of quality measures on the nursing home compare web site differ by nursing home characteristics?

Authors:  Jacqueline Zinn; William Spector; Lillian Hsieh; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-12

5.  Information and consumer choice: the value of publicized health plan ratings.

Authors:  Ginger Zhe Jin; Alan T Sorensen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards.

Authors:  A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation.

Authors:  D B Mukamel; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-01

8.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Elizabeth A Stuart; Edward C Norton; Daniel Polsky; Jeongyoung Park
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  27 in total

1.  The Effects of Antipsychotic Quality Reporting on Antipsychotic and Psychoactive Medication Use.

Authors:  John R Bowblis; Judith A Lucas; Christopher S Brunt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Making difficult decisions: the role of quality of care in choosing a nursing home.

Authors:  Irena Pesis-Katz; Charles E Phelps; Helena Temkin-Greener; William D Spector; Peter Veazie; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Competition and quality in a physiotherapy market with fixed prices.

Authors:  Piia Pekola; Ismo Linnosmaa; Hennamari Mikkola
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.

Authors:  Yunfeng Shi; Dennis P Scanlon; Neeraj Bhandari; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality.

Authors:  Marcelo Coca Perraillon; R Tamara Konetzka; Daifeng He; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-23

6.  The Effect of Publicized Quality Information on Home Health Agency Choice.

Authors:  Jeah Kyoungrae Jung; Bingxiao Wu; Hyunjee Kim; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  State focus on health care-associated infection prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  Catherine C Cohen; Carolyn T A Herzig; Eileen J Carter; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Elaine L Larson; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Zhiqiu Ye; Laurent G Glance; Yue Li
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Nursing Home Staff Palliative Care Knowledge and Practices: Results of a Large Survey of Frontline Workers.

Authors:  Kathleen T Unroe; John G Cagle; Kathleen A Lane; Christopher M Callahan; Susan C Miller
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.