Literature DB >> 20820030

Public reporting drove quality gains at nursing homes.

Rachel Werner1, Elizabeth Stuart, Daniel Polsky.   

Abstract

Public reporting of the quality of care delivered in hospitals and nursing homes is thought to foster improvements in care. When information is available, consumers may choose high-quality providers. That choice, in turn, may stimulate providers to improve quality as a way to attract a larger share of the market. However, these assumptions have gone largely untested. We examined short-stay care provided at 8,137 nursing homes after the Nursing Home Compare public reporting requirements went into effect in 2002. We found that quality improved both because consumers chose higher-quality nursing homes and because providers improved the care they delivered. These findings support the continued use of public reporting to improve quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20820030     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  16 in total

1.  End-of-life quality-of-care measures for nursing homes: place of death and hospice.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Thomas Caprio; Richard Ahn; Nan Tracy Zheng; Sally Norton; Timothy Quill; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Policy to Reduce Antipsychotic Use and Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.

Authors:  Sijiu Wang; Helena Temkin-Greener; Yeates Conwell; Shubing Cai
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.669

3.  Association of race and sites of care with pressure ulcers in high-risk nursing home residents.

Authors:  Yue Li; Jun Yin; Xueya Cai; Jna Temkin-Greener; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Program Interruptions and Short-Stay Transfers Represent Potential Targets for Inpatient Rehabilitation Care-Improvement Efforts.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; James E Graham; Shilpa Krishnan; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Is higher volume of postacute care patients associated with a lower rehospitalization rate in skilled nursing facilities?

Authors:  Yue Li; Xueya Cai; Jun Yin; Laurent G Glance; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Considering potential benefits and consequences of hospital report cards: what are the next steps?

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Making difficult decisions: the role of quality of care in choosing a nursing home.

Authors:  Irena Pesis-Katz; Charles E Phelps; Helena Temkin-Greener; William D Spector; Peter Veazie; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Spending On Care After Surgery Driven By Choice Of Care Settings Instead Of Intensity Of Services.

Authors:  Lena M Chen; Edward C Norton; Mousumi Banerjee; Scott E Regenbogen; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  State "technical assistance programs" for nursing home quality improvement: variations and potential implications.

Authors:  Yue Li; William D Spector; Laurent G Glance; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2012

10.  Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.