INTRODUCTION: A qualitative assessment of discharge resource needs is important for developing evidence-based care improvements in neurocritically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic hospital and included all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) during an 18-month period. Telephone assessments were made at 3 to 6 months after admission. Patients or caregivers were asked whether they had adequate resources upon discharge and whether they had any unanswered questions. The content of responses was reviewed by a neurointensivist and a neurocritical care nurse practitioner. A structured codebook was developed, organized into themes, and applied to the responses. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients or caregivers responded regarding access to resources at discharge with 114 individual codable responses. Responses centered around 5 themes with 23 unique codes: satisfied, needs improvement, dissatisfied, poor post-ICU care, and poor health. The most frequently coded responses were that caregivers believed their loved one had experienced an unclear discharge (n = 11) or premature discharge (n = 12). Two hundred four patients or caregivers responded regarding unanswered questions or additional comments at follow-up, with 516 codable responses. These centered around 6 themes with 26 unique codes: positive experience, negative experience, neutral experience, medical questions, ongoing medical care or concern, or remembrance of time spent in the ICU. The most frequent response was that caregivers or patients stated that they received good care (n = 115). Multiple concerns were brought up, including lack of follow-up after hospitalization (n = 15) and dissatisfaction with post-ICU care (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining qualitative responses after discharge provided insight into the transition from critical care. This could form the basis for an intervention to provide a smoother transition from the ICU to the outpatient setting.
INTRODUCTION: A qualitative assessment of discharge resource needs is important for developing evidence-based care improvements in neurocritically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic hospital and included all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) during an 18-month period. Telephone assessments were made at 3 to 6 months after admission. Patients or caregivers were asked whether they had adequate resources upon discharge and whether they had any unanswered questions. The content of responses was reviewed by a neurointensivist and a neurocritical care nurse practitioner. A structured codebook was developed, organized into themes, and applied to the responses. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients or caregivers responded regarding access to resources at discharge with 114 individual codable responses. Responses centered around 5 themes with 23 unique codes: satisfied, needs improvement, dissatisfied, poor post-ICU care, and poor health. The most frequently coded responses were that caregivers believed their loved one had experienced an unclear discharge (n = 11) or premature discharge (n = 12). Two hundred four patients or caregivers responded regarding unanswered questions or additional comments at follow-up, with 516 codable responses. These centered around 6 themes with 26 unique codes: positive experience, negative experience, neutral experience, medical questions, ongoing medical care or concern, or remembrance of time spent in the ICU. The most frequent response was that caregivers or patients stated that they received good care (n = 115). Multiple concerns were brought up, including lack of follow-up after hospitalization (n = 15) and dissatisfaction with post-ICU care (n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining qualitative responses after discharge provided insight into the transition from critical care. This could form the basis for an intervention to provide a smoother transition from the ICU to the outpatient setting.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Shilpa Krishnan; Monique R Pappadis; Susan C Weller; Steve R Fisher; Catherine C Hay; Timothy A Reistetter Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Christine D Jones; Jacqueline Jones; Kathryn H Bowles; Shara Schroeder; Frederick A Masoudi; Eric A Coleman; Jason Falvey; Cari R Levy; Rebecca S Boxer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Gregor Broessner; Raimund Helbok; Peter Lackner; Michael Mitterberger; Ronny Beer; Klaus Engelhardt; Christian Brenneis; Bettina Pfausler; Erich Schmutzhard Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tamilyn Bakas; Joan K Austin; Barbara Habermann; Nenette M Jessup; Susan M McLennon; Pamela H Mitchell; Gwendolyn Morrison; Ziyi Yang; Timothy E Stump; Michael T Weaver Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-11-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ines C Kiphuth; Peter D Schellinger; Martin Köhrmann; Jürgen Bardutzky; Hannes Lücking; Stephan Kloska; Stefan Schwab; Hagen B Huttner Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Roland Backhaus; Franz Aigner; Felix Schlachetzki; Dagmar Steffling; Wolfgang Jakob; Andreas Steinbrecher; Bernhard Kaiser; Peter Hau; Sandra Boy; Kornelius Fuchs; Ulrich Bogdahn; Markus Ritzka Journal: Neurol Res Int Date: 2015-06-24
Authors: Shraddha Mainali; Venkatesh Aiyagari; Sheila Alexander; Yelena Bodien; Varina Boerwinkle; Melanie Boly; Emery Brown; Jeremy Brown; Jan Claassen; Brian L Edlow; Ericka L Fink; Joseph J Fins; Brandon Foreman; Jennifer Frontera; Romergryko G Geocadin; Joseph Giacino; Emily J Gilmore; Olivia Gosseries; Flora Hammond; Raimund Helbok; J Claude Hemphill; Karen Hirsch; Keri Kim; Steven Laureys; Ariane Lewis; Geoffrey Ling; Sarah L Livesay; Victoria McCredie; Molly McNett; David Menon; Erika Molteni; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; Soojin Park; Len Polizzotto; Jose Javier Provencio; Louis Puybasset; Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao; Courtney Robertson; Benjamin Rohaut; Michael Rubin; Tarek Sharshar; Lori Shutter; Gisele Sampaio Silva; Wade Smith; Robert D Stevens; Aurore Thibaut; Paul Vespa; Amy K Wagner; Wendy C Ziai; Elizabeth Zink; Jose I Suarez Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.532