Literature DB >> 24159921

Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards.

Dana B Mukamel1, Simon F Haeder, David L Weimer.   

Abstract

The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159921     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  21 in total

1.  Building an Ideal Quality Metric for ESRD Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Laura D Buccini; Michael P Phelan; Colleen L Jay; David A Goldfarb; Emilio D Poggio; John R Sedor
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  A Bayesian procedure for estimating the causal effects of nursing home bed-hold policy.

Authors:  Roee Gutman; Orna Intrator; Tony Lancaster
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Zhiqiu Ye; Laurent G Glance; Yue Li
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Facility and State Variation in Hip Fracture in U.S. Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Andrew R Zullo; Tingting Zhang; Geetanjoli Banerjee; Yoojin Lee; Kevin W McConeghy; Douglas P Kiel; Lori A Daiello; Vincent Mor; Sarah D Berry
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Assessing mechanisms of benefit in adult day programs: the adult day services process and use measures.

Authors:  Joseph E Gaugler; Kaitlyn Dykes
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.658

7.  Effects of Leader Tactics on the Creativity, Implementation, and Evolution of Ideas to Improve Healthcare Delivery.

Authors:  Yuna S H Lee; Paul D Cleary; Ingrid M Nembhard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a framework and a case study of its application.

Authors:  Jan W van der Scheer; Matthew Woodward; Akbar Ansari; Tim Draycott; Cathy Winter; Graham Martin; Karolina Kuberska; Natalie Richards; Ruth Kern; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Quality-based ratings in Medicare and trends in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.734

10.  Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.

Authors:  Charlotte M Kugler; Karina K De Santis; Tanja Rombey; Kaethe Goossen; Jessica Breuing; Nadja Könsgen; Tim Mathes; Simone Hess; René Burchard; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.