Literature DB >> 29381669

Hospital Discharge and Selecting a Skilled Nursing Facility: A Comparison of Experiences and Perspectives of Patients and Their Families.

Dara H Sorkin1, Alpesh Amin, David L Weimer, Joseph Sharit, Heather Ladd, Dana B Mukamel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF STUDY: A currently proposed rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services would require providers to devote more resources to discharge planning from hospitals to ensure the prioritization of patient preferences and goals in the discharge planning process. Annually, more than 3 million persons enter a nursing home in the United States, with the vast majority of patients coming directly from hospitals. Although early evidence suggests more family involvement than patient involvement in the discharge process, most of this work has relied on retrospective reports of the decision-making process postplacement. This article seeks to examine and compare the experiences and perspectives of patients and others involved in the selection of the nursing home (predominately adult children and spouses). PRIMARY PRACTICE
SETTING: Large academic medical hospital with patients being discharged to a skilled nursing facility. METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE: A total of 225 patients or their family members and involved others who completed an exit survey assessing their experiences and perspectives in selecting a skilled nursing home and in experiencing the discharge process more generally.
RESULTS: Patients were the primary decision makers about 23% of the time but were often involved in the decision even when family members/involved others were primarily making decisions in the discharge process. Although patients were involved in the selection of the nursing home to a lesser degree than involved others, their level of satisfaction with the decision to be discharged to a skilled nursing home and their level of satisfaction with their personal level of involvement with the selection of the specific nursing home did not differ from the satisfaction ratings of the involved others. Furthermore, their confidence in the decision and their satisfaction with the decision did not differ from ratings provided by family members/involved others. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: Recommendations for case management practice include (1) encouraging patients and their families to take an active role in the discharge process; (2) incorporating technology into the discharge process that promotes this active level of engagement; and (3) facilitating access to data to promote discharge to the highest quality nursing homes available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29381669      PMCID: PMC5796431          DOI: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prof Case Manag        ISSN: 1932-8087


  14 in total

1.  Choosing an adult foster home or a nursing home: residents' perceptions about decision making and control.

Authors:  J Reinardy; R A Kane
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  1999-11

2.  Discharge planning issues in hospitals: steering to preferred certified home health agencies and the risks of providing free discharge planning services to hospitals.

Authors:  Connie A Raffa
Journal:  Caring       Date:  2009-05

3.  Use Of Nursing Home Compare Website Appears Limited By Lack Of Awareness And Initial Mistrust Of The Data.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Marcelo Coca Perraillon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Contributors to Patients' Ratings of Quality of Care Among Ethnically Diverse Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Sarah E Choi; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; John Billimek; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-04

5.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  CMS proposes prioritizing patient preferences, linking patients to follow-up care in discharge planning process.

Authors: 
Journal:  ED Manag       Date:  2016-03

7.  Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision scale with depressed primary care patients.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; S Greenfield; B Gandek; W H Rogers; J E Ware
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  When Patients Customize Nursing Home Ratings, Choices And Rankings Differ From The Government's Version.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Alpesh Amin; David L Weimer; Joseph Sharit; Heather Ladd; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reimagining Family Involvement in Residential Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Joseph E Gaugler; Lauren L Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  The Experience of a Neurocritical Care Admission and Discharge for Patients and Their Families: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Rath; Natalie Kreitzer; Erika Schlichter; Omar Lopez; Simona Ferioli; Laura B Ngwenya; Brandon Foreman
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.627

3.  Factors Associated with Discharge to a Skilled Nursing Facility after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Carolyn E Horne; Tamara S Goda; L Wiley Nifong; Alan P Kypson; Wesley T O'Neal; Linda C Kindell; Charulata Jindal; Jimmy T Efird
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.