| Literature DB >> 26744343 |
W Tanis1, R P J Budde2, I A C van der Bilt3, B Delemarre3, G Hoohenkerk4, J-K van Rooden5, A M Scholtens6, J Habets6, S Chamuleau3.
Abstract
Prosthetic heart valve (PHV) dysfunction remains difficult to recognise correctly by two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE). ECG-triggered multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT), 18-fluorine-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography including low-dose CT (FDG-PET) and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) may have additional value. This paper reviews the role of these novel imaging tools in the field of PHV obstruction and endocarditis.For acquired PHV obstruction, MDCT is of additional value in mechanical PHVs to differentiate pannus from thrombus as well as to dynamically study leaflet motion and opening/closing angles. For biological PHV obstruction, additional imaging is not beneficial as it does not change patient management. When performed on top of 2D-TTE/TEE, MDCT has additional value for the detection of both vegetations and pseudoaneurysms/abscesses in PHV endocarditis. FDG-PET has no complementary value for the detection of vegetations; however, it appears more sensitive in the early detection of pseudoaneurysms/abscesses. Furthermore, FDG-PET enables the detection of metastatic and primary extra-cardiac infections. Evidence for the additional value of 3D-TEE is scarce.As clinical implications are major, clinicians should have a low threshold to perform additional MDCT in acquired mechanical PHV obstruction. For suspected PHV endocarditis, both FDG-PET and MDCT have complementary value.Entities:
Keywords: 18-fluorine-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Endocarditis; Multidetector-row computed tomography; Pannus; Prosthetic heart valve; Thrombosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 26744343 PMCID: PMC4722008 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-015-0796-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neth Heart J ISSN: 1568-5888 Impact factor: 2.380
Modified Duke criteria for infective prosthetic heart valve endocarditis; in bold: the suggested change of the modified Duke criteria
|
|
|
|
| *Typical microorganism from two separate blood cultures: |
| Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus bovis, HACEK Group, Staphylococcus aureus; community-acquired enterococci, in absence of a primary focus or |
| *Microorganism from persistently positive blood cultures: |
| At least two positive blood cultures drawn > 12 h apart or all of three or a majority of ≥ four separate cultures positive with the first and last drawn at least 1 h apart or |
| *Single positive blood culture for Coxiella burnetii or phase 1 IgG antibody titre > 1:800 |
|
|
| *Echocardiography: positive signs for infective endocarditis (vegetation, leaflet perforation, abscess, new partial dehiscence of the PHV) |
| *Molecular imaging (FDG−PET or leucocyte scan): for the detection of periannular infiltration |
| *Computed tomography: for the detection of periannular infiltration and/or vegetations |
|
|
| *Predisposition: predisposing heart condition such as PHV or injection drug use |
| *Fever: temperature > 38 ℃ |
| *Vascular phenomena: major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial haemorrhages, Janeway lesions |
| *Immunological phenomena: glomeronephritis, Osler’s nodes, Roth’s spots, rheumatoid factor |
| *Microbiological evidence: positive blood culture that does not meet the major criterion |
|
|
| 2 major criteria |
| 1 major and 3 minor criteria |
| 5 minor criteria |
|
|
| 1 major and 1 minor criteria |
| 3 minor criteria |
Fig. 1Vegetations missed by TEE. Patient with an aortic bioprosthesis for 3 years, presented with an infection of a knee replacement prosthesis (streptococcus). Blood cultures remained negative and TEE revealed no abnormalities (Panel a and d). CTA however detected hypodense masses (panel b and e, arrows) fitting with vegetations, which were successfully treated with 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic treatment (panel c and f)
Fig. 2Pseudoaneurysm missed by TEE. Patient with an aortic mechanical prosthesis implanted 2 years before, presented with a Proprionii acnes bacteraemia. TEE missed the periannular extension (arrows)
Fig. 3Case versus Control. Panel a and b: Aortic bileaflet mechanical PHV implanted 16 months previously, multiple blood cultures were positive for Proprionii bacterium. TTE and TEE did not show abnormalities and modified Duke criteria were not fulfilled. FDG-PET (a) showed severe FDG uptake. After fusion with MDCT, the FDG uptake was detected around the PHV ring (b), suggestive of widespread periannular extension of endocarditis around the whole PHV, which was confirmed at subsequent surgical inspection and pathological examination. Panel c and d: Aortic bileaflet St. Jude prosthesis in the chronic postoperative phase without suspected endocarditis. Metabolic imaging by FDG-PET on the level of the PHV did not show uptake. Re-printed with permission [20]
Fig. 4Metastatic infection in PHV endocarditis detected by whole body FDG-PET/low-dose CT. Bileaflet mechanical PHV in aortic position for 6 years, and seven consecutive blood cultures with Streptococcus pneumoniae. a TEE showed a vegetation (arrow) and thickened wall (asterisk) without colour Doppler flow in the former non-coronary cusp region, suggestive of an abscess. Former right coronary cusp (RCC) imaging is hampered by reverberations (arrowhead). b CTA confirmed TEE findings but also detected an abscess in the RCC region (asterisks). Panel c: CTA fused with FDG-PET confirmed abscesses (asterisks). The vegetation (arrow) did not show FDG uptake. Additionally, whole body FDG-PET/CT showed a metastatic infection in the spleen (Panel d, arrow), in this case an abscess requiring percutaneous drainage. Re-printed with permission [20]
Fig. 5Imaging strategy for suspected PHV endocarditis
Fluoroscopy/Echocardiography/cardiac MDCT predictors for obstructive PHV pannus versus thrombus
|
|
|
| Leaflet restriction mostly present | Leaflet restriction always present |
| Leaflet restriction may be absent | Total occlusion of one leaflet and normal opening of the other leaflet (in bileaflet PHVs) |
|
|
|
| Slow increase gradients/decrease EOA | Sudden increase gradient/decrease EOA |
| Absent/small mass on inflow side of PHV | Present mass/large mass on inflow + outflow side of PHV |
| Hard echo density | Soft echo density |
|
|
|
| Hypodense mass on inflow side PHV | Hypodense mass on inflow and outflow side PHV |
| Mass anatomy: (semi)circular configuration curved along the valve ring | Mass anatomy: irregular shape, directly attached to the leaflets/hinge points |
EOA effective orifice area, MDCT multidetector-row computed tomography, PHV prosthetic heart valve.
Fig. 6PHV obstruction case. Case 1: a Fluoroscopy; normal systolic opening angles of an aortic St. Jude mechanical PHV. b TEE; showing subprosthetic tissue (arrow). c MDCT; showing hypodense subvalvular tissue (arrow) curved along the PHV ring which was pannus confirmed by surgery. Case 2: a Fluoroscopy; both leaflets show systolic restriction. b TEE: aortic Tophat PHV its acoustic shadowing and reverberations (arrow). c MDCT shows hypodense subprosthetic tissue curved along the PHV ring which was pannus confirmed by surgery. Case 3: a Both leaflets show systolic restriction detected by MDCT. b TEE shows an oscillating mass at the aortic side of the St. Jude PHV. c MDCT shows an irregular shaped and hypodense mass directly attached to the occluder on the ventricular and aortic side which was thrombus confirmed by surgery. Re-printed with permission [43]
Fig. 7Imaging strategy for PHV obstruction