Literature DB >> 16353445

Mechanical testing of human cardiac tissue: some implications for MRI safety.

Maria-Benedicta Edwards1, Edward R C Draper, Jeffrey W Hand, Kenneth M Taylor, Ian R Young.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effects of aging on tissue strength and its ability to withstand forces associated with MRI have not been investigated. This study aimed to determine the forces required to cause partial or total detachment of a heart valve prosthesis in patients with age-related degenerative diseases exposed to MRI.
METHODS: Eighteen tissue samples excised during routine heart valve replacement surgery were subjected to a suture pull-out test using a tensile materials testing machine. Five preconditioning cycles were applied before commencing the final destructive test. The test was complete when the sample ruptured and the suture was pulled completely free from the tissue. Results were compared with previously calculated magnetically induced forces at 4.7 T.
RESULTS: All tissue samples displayed a basic failure pattern. Mean forces required to cause initial yield and total rupture were 4.0 N (+/- 3.3 N) and 4.9 N (+/- 3.6 N), respectively. Significant factors determining initial yield were stenosed calcific tissue (p < .01), calcific degeneration (single pathology) (p < .04) and tissue stiffness (p < .01). Calcific degeneration (p < .03) and tissue stiffness (p < .03) were also significant in determining maximum force required to cause total rupture.
CONCLUSION: Specific age-related degenerative cardiac diseases stiffen and strengthen tissue resulting in significant forces being required to pull a suture through valve annulus tissue. These forces are significantly greater than magnetically induced < 4.7 T. Therefore, patients with degenerative valvular diseases are unlikely to be at risk of valve dehiscence during exposure to static magnetic field < or = 4.7 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16353445     DOI: 10.1080/10976640500288149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  10 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Autofluorescence guided welding of heart tissue by laser pulse bursts at 1550 nm.

Authors:  Karina Litvinova; Maria Chernysheva; Berthold Stegemann; Francisco Leyva
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  A mathematical model for analyzing the elasticity, viscosity, and failure of soft tissue: comparison of native and decellularized porcine cardiac extracellular matrix for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tomer Bronshtein; Gigi Chi Ting Au-Yeung; Udi Sarig; Evelyne Bao-Vi Nguyen; Priyadarshini S Mhaisalkar; Freddy Yin Chiang Boey; Subbu S Venkatraman; Marcelle Machluf
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 5.  Valvular Endothelial Cell Response to the Mechanical Environment-A Review.

Authors:  Nandini Deb; Carla M R Lacerda
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.194

6.  Suture forces in undersized mitral annuloplasty: novel device and measurements.

Authors:  Andrew W Siefert; Eric L Pierce; Madonna Lee; Morten Ø Jensen; Chikashi Aoki; Satoshi Takebayashi; Joan Fernandez Esmerats; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  How Local Annular Force and Collagen Density Govern Mitral Annuloplasty Ring Dehiscence Risk.

Authors:  Eric L Pierce; Andrew W Siefert; Deborah M Paul; Sarah K Wells; Charles H Bloodworth; Satoshi Takebayashi; Chikashi Aoki; Morten O Jensen; Matthew J Gillespie; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  How Strong Can We Pull? Critical Thresholds for Traction Forces on the Aortic Annulus: Measurements on Fresh Porcine Hearts.

Authors:  Martin Hartrumpf; Josephine Sterner; Filip Schroeter; Ralf-Uwe Kuehnel; Roya Ostovar; Johannes M Albes
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.948

10.  Novel imaging strategies for the detection of prosthetic heart valve obstruction and endocarditis.

Authors:  W Tanis; R P J Budde; I A C van der Bilt; B Delemarre; G Hoohenkerk; J-K van Rooden; A M Scholtens; J Habets; S Chamuleau
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.380

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.