Literature DB >> 2766505

Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study.

D J Burstow1, R A Nishimura, K R Bailey, G S Reeder, D R Holmes, J B Seward, A J Tajik.   

Abstract

Studies correlating prosthetic valve gradients determined by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography with gradients obtained by cardiac catheterization have, to date, been limited to patients with mitral and tricuspid prostheses or have compared nonsimultaneous measurements. Simultaneous Doppler and catheter pressure gradients in 36 patients (mean age, 63 +/- 13 years) with 42 prosthetic valves (20 aortic, 20 mitral, one tricuspid, and one pulmonary) were studied. Catheter gradients were obtained using a dual-catheter technique. The simultaneous pressure tracings and Doppler flow velocity profiles were digitized at 10-msec intervals to derive the corresponding maximal and mean gradients. The correlation between the maximal Doppler gradient and the simultaneously measured maximal catheter gradient was 0.94 (SEE = 6), and that between the Doppler gradient and the simultaneously measured mean catheter gradient was 0.96 (SEE = 3). There were no significant differences in correlation between gradients for the 32 mechanical valves (maximal gradients: r = 0.95, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.96, SEE = 3) and the 10 bioprosthetic valves (maximal gradients: r = 0.89, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.93, SEE = 3). In patients with mitral prostheses, Doppler gradients correlated well with the corresponding catheter gradients obtained with direct measurement of left atrial pressure (maximal gradients: r = 0.96, SEE = 2; mean gradients: r = 0.97, SEE = 1.2). A close correlation between corresponding Doppler and catheter gradients also was found in patients with aortic prostheses (maximal gradients: r = 0.94, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.94, SEE = 3). Thus, continuous wave Doppler echocardiography can accurately predict the pressure gradient across prosthetic valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2766505     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.80.3.504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

1.  [Hemodynamic evaluations of patients with small aortic annulus with St. Jude Medical prosthetic heart valve].

Authors:  T Shimabukuro; Y Takeuchi; A Gomi; H Nakatani; Y Suda; K Kono; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

2.  Detection of "pathologic" prosthetic valve stenosis via exercise Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  M Shigenobu; S Sano
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Novel imaging strategies for the detection of prosthetic heart valve obstruction and endocarditis.

Authors:  W Tanis; R P J Budde; I A C van der Bilt; B Delemarre; G Hoohenkerk; J-K van Rooden; A M Scholtens; J Habets; S Chamuleau
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  Trans-Catheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation for the Treatment of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Failure.

Authors:  Andrea Buono; Diego Maffeo; Giovanni Troise; Francesco Donatelli; Maurizio Tespili; Alfonso Ielasi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Measuring Pressure Gradients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Rethinking the Bernoulli Principle.

Authors:  Yogesh N V Reddy; William R Miranda; Rick A Nishimura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.