Literature DB >> 26731644

Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Avigael M Aizenman2, Sage E P Boettcher3, Matthew S Cain4.   

Abstract

This paper introduces the "hybrid foraging" paradigm. In typical visual search tasks, observers search for one instance of one target among distractors. In hybrid search, observers search through visual displays for one instance of any of several types of target held in memory. In foraging search, observers collect multiple instances of a single target type from visual displays. Combining these paradigms, in hybrid foraging tasks observers search visual displays for multiple instances of any of several types of target (as might be the case in searching the kitchen for dinner ingredients or an X-ray for different pathologies). In the present experiment, observers held 8-64 target objects in memory. They viewed displays of 60-105 randomly moving photographs of objects and used the computer mouse to collect multiple targets before choosing to move to the next display. Rather than selecting at random among available targets, observers tended to collect items in runs of one target type. Reaction time (RT) data indicate searching again for the same item is more efficient than searching for any other targets, held in memory. Observers were trying to maximize collection rate. As a result, and consistent with optimal foraging theory, they tended to leave 25-33% of targets uncollected when moving to the next screen/patch. The pattern of RTs shows that while observers were collecting a target item, they had already begun searching memory and the visual display for additional targets, making the hybrid foraging task a useful way to investigate the interaction of visual and memory search.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Human search; Hybrid foraging; Hybrid search; Multiple targets; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26731644      PMCID: PMC4754784          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  The central executive as a search process: priming exploration and exploitation across domains.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Peter M Todd; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-11

2.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

Review 3.  Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.

Authors:  E James Potchen
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.

Authors:  R Ward; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Profiles in patient safety: misplaced femoral line guidewire and multiple failures to detect the foreign body on chest radiography.

Authors:  Timothy E Lum; Rollin J Fairbanks; Elliot C Pennington; Frank L Zwemer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Sage E P Boettcher; Emilie L Josephs; Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.

Authors:  Matthew S Cain; Edward Vul; Kait Clark; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-08-06

10.  The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-03-24
View more
  10 in total

1.  Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Caroline Seidel; Jeremy Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-08-15

2.  Priming effects in inefficient visual search: Real, but transient.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Sneha B Suresh; Alec W Dewulf; Wanyi Lyu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.

Authors:  Marcos Bella-Fernández; Manuel Suero Suñé; Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-21

5.  Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 7.  Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.

Authors:  Nick Donnelly; Alex Muhl-Richardson; Hayward J Godwin; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04

8.  Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.

Authors:  Alasdair D F Clarke; Amelia R Hunt; Anna E Hughes
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Abla Alaoui-Soce; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Implicitly and explicitly encoded features can guide attention in free viewing.

Authors:  Aoqi Li; Jeremy M Wolfe; Zhenzhong Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.