Literature DB >> 33745028

Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.

Marcos Bella-Fernández1,2, Manuel Suero Suñé3, Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño4.   

Abstract

Visual search (VS) is a fundamental task in daily life widely studied for over half a century. A variant of the classic paradigm-searching one target among distractors-requires the observer to look for several (undetermined) instances of a target (so-called foraging) or several targets that may appear an undefined number of times (recently named as hybrid foraging). In these searches, besides looking for targets, the observer must decide how much time is needed to exploit the area, and when to quit the search to eventually explore new search options. In fact, visual foraging is a very common search task in the real world, probably involving additional cognitive functions than typical VS. It has been widely studied in natural animal environments, for which several mathematical models have been proposed, and just recently applied to humans: Lévy processes, composite and area-restricted search models, marginal value theorem, and Bayesian learning (among others). We conducted a systematic search in the literature to understand those mathematical models and study its applicability in human visual foraging. The review suggests that these models might be the first step, but they seem to be limited to fully comprehend foraging in visual search. There are essential variables involving human visual foraging still to be established and understood. Indeed, a jointly theoretical interpretation based on the different models reviewed could better account for its understanding. In addition, some other relevant variables, such as certain individual differences or time perception might be crucial to understanding visual foraging in humans.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33745028     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  69 in total

1.  Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Ultimate failure of the Lévy Foraging Hypothesis: Two-scale searching strategies outperform scale-free ones even when prey are scarce and cryptic.

Authors:  Simon Benhamou; Julien Collet
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk?

Authors:  Simon Benhamou
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Empirical evidence that large marine predator foraging behavior is consistent with area-restricted search theory.

Authors:  H Bailey; V Lyubchich; J Wingfield; A Fandel; A Garrod; A N Rice
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Tidal drift removes the need for area-restricted search in foraging Atlantic puffins.

Authors:  Ashley Bennison; John L Quinn; Alison Debney; Mark Jessopp
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Scale-invariant movements of fishermen: the same foraging strategy as natural predators.

Authors:  Sophie Bertrand; Arnaud Bertrand; Renato Guevara-Carrasco; François Gerlotto
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Damien R Farine; Richard P Mann; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Adaptive intertemporal preferences in foraging-style environments.

Authors:  Michael T Bixter; Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.

Authors:  Lubna Ahmed; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stochastic optimal foraging: tuning intensive and extensive dynamics in random searches.

Authors:  Frederic Bartumeus; Ernesto P Raposo; Gandhimohan M Viswanathan; Marcos G E da Luz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.