Literature DB >> 22868494

A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.

Matthew S Cain1, Edward Vul, Kait Clark, Stephen R Mitroff.   

Abstract

Real-world visual searches often contain a variable and unknown number of targets. Such searches present difficult metacognitive challenges, as searchers must decide when to stop looking for additional targets, which results in high miss rates in multiple-target searches. In the study reported here, we quantified human strategies in multiple-target search via an ecological optimal foraging model and investigated whether searchers adapt their strategies to complex target-distribution statistics. Separate groups of individuals searched displays with the number of targets per trial sampled from different geometric distributions but with the same overall target prevalence. As predicted by optimal foraging theory, results showed that individuals searched longer when they expected more targets to be present and adjusted their expectations on-line during each search by taking into account the higher-order, across-trial target distributions. However, compared with modeled ideal observers, participants systematically responded as if the target distribution were more uniform than it was, which suggests that training could improve multiple-target search performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22868494     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612440460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  31 in total

1.  Using the past to anticipate the future in human foraging behavior.

Authors:  Jinxia Zhang; Xue Gong; Daryl Fougnie; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal.

Authors:  Anna Nowakowska; Alasdair D F Clarke; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Avigael M Aizenman; Sage E P Boettcher; Matthew S Cain
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Winter is coming: How humans forage in a temporally structured environment.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Jinxia Zhang; George A Alvarez; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.