Literature DB >> 26598668

High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Stéphane Côté1, Julian House2, Robb Willer3.   

Abstract

Research on social class and generosity suggests that higher-income individuals are less generous than poorer individuals. We propose that this pattern emerges only under conditions of high economic inequality, contexts that can foster a sense of entitlement among higher-income individuals that, in turn, reduces their generosity. Analyzing results of a unique nationally representative survey that included a real-stakes giving opportunity (n = 1,498), we found that in the most unequal US states, higher-income respondents were less generous than lower-income respondents. In the least unequal states, however, higher-income individuals were more generous. To better establish causality, we next conducted an experiment (n = 704) in which apparent levels of economic inequality in participants' home states were portrayed as either relatively high or low. Participants were then presented with a giving opportunity. Higher-income participants were less generous than lower-income participants when inequality was portrayed as relatively high, but there was no association between income and generosity when inequality was portrayed as relatively low. This research finds that the tendency for higher-income individuals to be less generous pertains only when inequality is high, challenging the view that higher-income individuals are necessarily more selfish, and suggesting a previously undocumented way in which inequitable resource distributions undermine collective welfare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generosity; income; inequality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598668      PMCID: PMC4702979          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511536112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Class and compassion: socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering.

Authors:  Jennifer E Stellar; Vida M Manzo; Michael W Kraus; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12-12

2.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Daniel M Stancato; Stéphane Côté; Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Michael W Kraus; Stéphane Côté; Bonnie Hayden Cheng; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-11

4.  Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishi; Hirokazu Shirado; David G Rand; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.

Authors:  Craig K Enders; Davood Tofighi
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-06

6.  Victim entitlement to behave selfishly.

Authors:  Emily M Zitek; Alexander H Jordan; Benoît Monin; Frederick R Leach
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-02

7.  Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile at a Time.

Authors:  Michael I Norton; Dan Ariely
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

8.  Social Class and (Un)Ethical Behavior: A Framework, With Evidence From a Large Population Sample.

Authors:  Stefan T Trautmann; Gijs van de Kuilen; Richard J Zeckhauser
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09

9.  A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff; Stefan C Schmukle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  In search of Homo economicus.

Authors:  Toshio Yamagishi; Yang Li; Haruto Takagishi; Yoshie Matsumoto; Toko Kiyonari
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-07-18
View more
  23 in total

1.  Human behavior under economic inequality shapes inequality.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishi; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution.

Authors:  Melissa L Sands
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage.

Authors:  Katherine A DeCelles; Michael I Norton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer.

Authors:  Jon M Jachimowicz; Barnabas Szaszi; Marcel Lukas; David Smerdon; Jaideep Prabhu; Elke U Weber
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-30

6.  Measuring inequality beyond the Gini coefficient may clarify conflicting findings.

Authors:  Kristin Blesch; Oliver P Hauser; Jon M Jachimowicz
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  How strategy environment and wealth shape altruistic behaviour: cooperation rules affecting wealth distribution in dynamic networks.

Authors:  Spandan Pathak; Prateek Verma; Sumit K Ram; Supratim Sengupta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games.

Authors:  Xiaojie Chen; Attila Szolnoki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Jun Won Park; Jacinth J X Tan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05

10.  Higher socioeconomic status does not predict decreased prosocial behavior in a field experiment.

Authors:  James Andreoni; Nikos Nikiforakis; Jan Stoop
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.