Literature DB >> 20649364

Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior.

Paul K Piff1, Michael W Kraus, Stéphane Côté, Bonnie Hayden Cheng, Dacher Keltner.   

Abstract

Lower social class (or socioeconomic status) is associated with fewer resources, greater exposure to threat, and a reduced sense of personal control. Given these life circumstances, one might expect lower class individuals to engage in less prosocial behavior, prioritizing self-interest over the welfare of others. The authors hypothesized, by contrast, that lower class individuals orient to the welfare of others as a means to adapt to their more hostile environments and that this orientation gives rise to greater prosocial behavior. Across 4 studies, lower class individuals proved to be more generous (Study 1), charitable (Study 2), trusting (Study 3), and helpful (Study 4) compared with their upper class counterparts. Mediator and moderator data showed that lower class individuals acted in a more prosocial fashion because of a greater commitment to egalitarian values and feelings of compassion. Implications for social class, prosocial behavior, and economic inequality are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649364     DOI: 10.1037/a0020092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  112 in total

1.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Daniel M Stancato; Stéphane Côté; Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior.

Authors:  Amos Schurr; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network.

Authors:  Keely A Muscatell; Sylvia A Morelli; Emily B Falk; Baldwin M Way; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Adam D Galinsky; Matthew D Lieberman; Mirella Dapretto; Naomi I Eisenberger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya.

Authors:  Catherine C Thomas; Nicholas G Otis; Justin R Abraham; Hazel Rose Markus; Gregory M Walton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Societies' tightness moderates age differences in perceived justifiability of morally debatable behaviors.

Authors:  Da Jiang; Tianyuan Li; Takeshi Hamamura
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2015-06-17

7.  Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Ana Guinote; Ioanna Cotzia; Sanpreet Sandhu; Pramila Siwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A Review of the Key Considerations in Mental Health Services Research: A Focus on Low-Income Children and Families.

Authors:  Deborah J Jones; Margaret Anton; Chloe Zachary; Sarah Pittman; Patrick Turner; Rex Forehand; Olga Khavjou
Journal:  Couple Family Psychol       Date:  2016-12

9.  Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality.

Authors:  Jens Ambrasat; Christian von Scheve; Markus Conrad; Gesche Schauenburg; Tobias Schröder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The strategy of psychopathy: primary psychopathic traits predict defection on low-value relationships.

Authors:  Matthew M Gervais; Michelle Kline; Mara Ludmer; Rachel George; Joseph H Manson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.