Literature DB >> 26352469

Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks.

Akihiro Nishi1,2, Hirokazu Shirado1,2, David G Rand1,3,4, Nicholas A Christakis1,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Humans prefer relatively equal distributions of resources, yet societies have varying degrees of economic inequality. To investigate some of the possible determinants and consequences of inequality, here we perform experiments involving a networked public goods game in which subjects interact and gain or lose wealth. Subjects (n = 1,462) were randomly assigned to have higher or lower initial endowments, and were embedded within social networks with three levels of economic inequality (Gini coefficient = 0.0, 0.2, and 0.4). In addition, we manipulated the visibility of the wealth of network neighbours. We show that wealth visibility facilitates the downstream consequences of initial inequality-in initially more unequal situations, wealth visibility leads to greater inequality than when wealth is invisible. This result reflects a heterogeneous response to visibility in richer versus poorer subjects. We also find that making wealth visible has adverse welfare consequences, yielding lower levels of overall cooperation, inter-connectedness, and wealth. High initial levels of economic inequality alone, however, have relatively few deleterious welfare effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26352469     DOI: 10.1038/nature15392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  40 in total

1.  Human behavior under economic inequality shapes inequality.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishi; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution.

Authors:  Melissa L Sands
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolutionary consequences of behavioral diversity.

Authors:  Alexander J Stewart; Todd L Parsons; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Make recycled goods covetable.

Authors:  Bruce Hood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage.

Authors:  Katherine A DeCelles; Michael I Norton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer.

Authors:  Jon M Jachimowicz; Barnabas Szaszi; Marcel Lukas; David Smerdon; Jaideep Prabhu; Elke U Weber
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-30

8.  Gini Coefficients as a Single Value Metric to Define Chemical Probe Selectivity.

Authors:  Andrei Ursu; Jessica L Childs-Disney; Alicia J Angelbello; Matthew G Costales; Samantha M Meyer; Matthew D Disney
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Authors:  Stéphane Côté; Julian House; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Integration of molecular pathology, epidemiology and social science for global precision medicine.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishi; Danny A Milner; Edward L Giovannucci; Reiko Nishihara; Andy S Tan; Ichiro Kawachi; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.