Literature DB >> 25037961

In search of Homo economicus.

Toshio Yamagishi1, Yang Li2, Haruto Takagishi2, Yoshie Matsumoto2, Toko Kiyonari3.   

Abstract

Homo economicus, a model for humans in neoclassical economics, is a rational maximizer of self-interest. However, many social scientists regard such a person as a mere imaginary creature. We found that 31 of 446 residents of relatively wealthy Tokyo suburbs met the behavioral definition of Homo economicus. In several rounds of economic games, participants whose behavior was consistent with this model always apportioned the money endowed by the experimenter to themselves, leaving no share for their partners. These participants had high IQs and a deliberative decision style. An additional 39 participants showed a similar disregard for other people's welfare, although they were slightly more altruistic than those in the Homo economicus group. The psychological composition of these quasi-Homo economicus participants was distinct from that of participants in the Homo economicus group. Although participants in the latter group behaved selfishly on the basis of rational calculations, those in the former group made selfish choices impulsively. The implications of these findings concerning the two types of extreme noncooperators are discussed.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Homo economicus; cooperation; dictator game; economic games; prisoner’s dilemma game; psychopathy; reciprocity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037961     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614538065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  20 in total

1.  How many masks do you buy? A simple dilemma task to differentiate between individual and social rationality.

Authors:  Zhixu Yang; Yixin Wang; Ziqiang Xin
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Authors:  Stéphane Côté; Julian House; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Adam Bear; David G Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Heritability of decisions and outcomes of public goods games.

Authors:  Kai Hiraishi; Chizuru Shikishima; Shinji Yamagata; Juko Ando
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-22

Review 5.  A neural trait approach to exploring individual differences in social preferences.

Authors:  Kyle Nash; Lorena R R Gianotti; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Prosocial Behavior Increases with Age across Five Economic Games.

Authors:  Yoshie Matsumoto; Toshio Yamagishi; Yang Li; Toko Kiyonari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Heterogeneous Motives in the Trust Game: A Tale of Two Roles.

Authors:  Antonio M Espín; Filippos Exadaktylos; Levent Neyse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  Individual Characteristics vs. Experience: An Experimental Study on Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma.

Authors:  Iván Barreda-Tarrazona; Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutiérrez; Marina Pavan; Gerardo Sabater-Grande
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-20

9.  Polymorphism of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Modulates Behavioral and Attitudinal Trust among Men but Not Women.

Authors:  Kuniyuki Nishina; Haruto Takagishi; Miho Inoue-Murayama; Hidehiko Takahashi; Toshio Yamagishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genetic Factors of Individual Differences in Decision Making in Economic Behavior: A Japanese Twin Study using the Allais Problem.

Authors:  Chizuru Shikishima; Kai Hiraishi; Shinji Yamagata; Juko Ando; Mitsuhiro Okada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.