Literature DB >> 34253718

Higher socioeconomic status does not predict decreased prosocial behavior in a field experiment.

James Andreoni1, Nikos Nikiforakis2, Jan Stoop3.   

Abstract

Does higher socioeconomic status predict decreased prosocial behavior? Methodological issues such as the reliance of survey studies on self-reported measures of prosociality, the insufficient control of relative incentives in experiments, and the use of non-random samples, have prevented researchers from ruling out that there is a negative association between socioeconomic status (SES) and prosociality. Here, we present results from a field experiment on the willingness of unaware individuals of different SES to undertake an effortful prosocial task-returning a misdelivered letter. Specifically, using the rental or sale value of homes as indicators of SES, we randomly selected households of high and low SES and misdelivered envelopes to them. Despite controlling for numerous covariates and performing a series of ancillary tests, we fail to find any evidence that higher SES predicts decreased prosocial behavior. Instead, we find that misdelivered letters are substantially more likely to be returned from high rather than low SES households.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34253718     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24519-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  15 in total

1.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Daniel M Stancato; Stéphane Côté; Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Paul K Piff; Michael W Kraus; Stéphane Côté; Bonnie Hayden Cheng; Dacher Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.

Authors:  David Dubois; Derek D Rucker; Adam D Galinsky
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-01-26

5.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ambivalent stereotypes link to peace, conflict, and inequality across 38 nations.

Authors:  Federica Durante; Susan T Fiske; Michele J Gelfand; Franca Crippa; Chiara Suttora; Amelia Stillwell; Frank Asbrock; Zeynep Aycan; Hege H Bye; Rickard Carlsson; Fredrik Björklund; Munqith Dagher; Armando Geller; Christian Albrekt Larsen; Abdel-Hamid Abdel Latif; Tuuli Anna Mähönen; Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti; Ali Teymoori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Ana Guinote; Ioanna Cotzia; Sanpreet Sandhu; Pramila Siwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff; Stefan C Schmukle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Authors:  Stéphane Côté; Julian House; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Giving behavior of millionaires.

Authors:  Paul Smeets; Rob Bauer; Uri Gneezy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Value Orientations and Institutional Trust as Contributors to the Adoption of Online Services in Youth: A Cross-Country Comparison.

Authors:  Žan Lep; Aleš Trunk; Katarina Babnik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Individuals of high socioeconomic status are altruistic in sharing money but egoistic in sharing time.

Authors:  Ulf Liebe; Nicole Schwitter; Andreas Tutić
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Global evidence on the selfish rich inequality hypothesis.

Authors:  Ingvild Almås; Alexander W Cappelen; Erik Ø Sørensen; Bertil Tungodden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Social Class Priming Effect on Prosociality: Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Xinlei Zang; Sainan Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  You before me: How vertical collectivism and feelings of threat predicted more socially desirable behaviour during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Vladimíra Čavojová; Magdalena Adamus; Eva Ballová Mikušková
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-03-19

6.  The Impact of Socialisation on Children's Prosocial Behaviour. A Study on Primary School Students.

Authors:  Antonio Tintori; Giulia Ciancimino; Rossella Palomba; Cristiana Clementi; Loredana Cerbara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Parental Psychological Control and Children's Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of Social Anxiety and the Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Weida Zhang; Guoliang Yu; Wangqian Fu; Runqing Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.