Literature DB >> 26193099

A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.

Martin Korndörfer1, Boris Egloff2, Stefan C Schmukle1.   

Abstract

Does being from a higher social class lead a person to engage in more or less prosocial behavior? Psychological research has recently provided support for a negative effect of social class on prosocial behavior. However, research outside the field of psychology has mainly found evidence for positive or u-shaped relations. In the present research, we therefore thoroughly examined the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. Moreover, we analyzed whether this effect was moderated by the kind of observed prosocial behavior, the observed country, and the measure of social class. Across eight studies with large and representative international samples, we predominantly found positive effects of social class on prosociality: Higher class individuals were more likely to make a charitable donation and contribute a higher percentage of their family income to charity (32,090 ≥ N ≥ 3,957; Studies 1-3), were more likely to volunteer (37,136 ≥N ≥ 3,964; Studies 4-6), were more helpful (N = 3,902; Study 7), and were more trusting and trustworthy in an economic game when interacting with a stranger (N = 1,421; Study 8) than lower social class individuals. Although the effects of social class varied somewhat across the kinds of prosocial behavior, countries, and measures of social class, under no condition did we find the negative effect that would have been expected on the basis of previous results reported in the psychological literature. Possible explanations for this divergence and implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26193099      PMCID: PMC4507988          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  60 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role?

Authors:  Linda C Gallo; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

Review 3.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goetz; Dacher Keltner; Emiliana Simon-Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

6.  A Bird's Eye View of Unethical Behavior: Commentary on Trautmann et al. (2013).

Authors:  Dan Ariely; Heather Mann
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09

7.  The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.

Authors:  Ulrich Schimmack
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-08-27

Review 8.  Political diversity will improve social psychological science.

Authors:  José L Duarte; Jarret T Crawford; Charlotta Stern; Jonathan Haidt; Lee Jussim; Philip E Tetlock
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Everything under control? The effects of age, gender, and education on trajectories of perceived control in a nationally representative German sample.

Authors:  Jule Specht; Boris Egloff; Stefan C Schmukle
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30

10.  Negotiators who give too much: unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining.

Authors:  Emily T Amanatullah; Michael W Morris; Jared R Curhan
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-09
View more
  27 in total

1.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cooperation as a signal of time preferences.

Authors:  Julien Lie-Panis; Jean-Baptiste André
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Authors:  Stéphane Côté; Julian House; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neighborhood Deprivation Negatively Impacts Children's Prosocial Behavior.

Authors:  Lou Safra; Teodora Tecu; Stéphane Lambert; Mark Sheskin; Nicolas Baumard; Coralie Chevallier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-14

5.  A 4-study replication of the moderating effects of greed on socioeconomic status and unethical behaviour.

Authors:  Anjana Balakrishnan; Paolo A Palma; Joshua Patenaude; Lorne Campbell
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.444

6.  Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations.

Authors:  Justin P Brienza; Igor Grossmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Does Hunger Contribute to Socioeconomic Gradients in Behavior?

Authors:  Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-10

8.  The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.

Authors:  Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-02-28

9.  Higher socioeconomic status does not predict decreased prosocial behavior in a field experiment.

Authors:  James Andreoni; Nikos Nikiforakis; Jan Stoop
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cislak; Aleksandra Cichocka; Adrian Dominik Wojcik; Natalia Frankowska
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.