Literature DB >> 26162108

Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile at a Time.

Michael I Norton1, Dan Ariely2.   

Abstract

Disagreements about the optimal level of wealth inequality underlie policy debates ranging from taxation to welfare. We attempt to insert the desires of "regular" Americans into these debates, by asking a nationally representative online panel to estimate the current distribution of wealth in the United States and to "build a better America" by constructing distributions with their ideal level of inequality. First, respondents dramatically underestimated the current level of wealth inequality. Second, respondents constructed ideal wealth distributions that were far more equitable than even their erroneously low estimates of the actual distribution. Most important from a policy perspective, we observed a surprising level of consensus: All demographic groups-even those not usually associated with wealth redistribution such as Republicans and the wealthy-desired a more equal distribution of wealth than the status quo.
© The Author(s) 2011.

Keywords:  fairness; income; inequality; justice; political ideology; wealth

Year:  2011        PMID: 26162108     DOI: 10.1177/1745691610393524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  42 in total

1.  Higher economic inequality intensifies the financial hardship of people living in poverty by fraying the community buffer.

Authors:  Jon M Jachimowicz; Barnabas Szaszi; Marcel Lukas; David Smerdon; Jaideep Prabhu; Elke U Weber
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-30

2.  Americans misperceive racial economic equality.

Authors:  Michael W Kraus; Julian M Rucker; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans' opportunity beliefs and policy support.

Authors:  Leslie McCall; Derek Burk; Marie Laperrière; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good.

Authors:  Karen Huang; Joshua D Greene; Max Bazerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structural inequalities drive late HIV diagnosis: The role of black racial concentration, income inequality, socioeconomic deprivation, and HIV testing.

Authors:  Yusuf Ransome; Ichiro Kawachi; Sarah Braunstein; Denis Nash
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 6.  Status, Power, and Intergroup Relations: The Personal Is the Societal.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Cydney H Dupree; Gandalf Nicolas; Jillian K Swencionis
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2016-10

7.  High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.

Authors:  Stéphane Côté; Julian House; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rawlsian maximin rule operates as a common cognitive anchor in distributive justice and risky decisions.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kameda; Keigo Inukai; Satomi Higuchi; Akitoshi Ogawa; Hackjin Kim; Tetsuya Matsuda; Masamichi Sakagami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Social-class differences in self-concept clarity and their implications for well-being.

Authors:  Jinkyung Na; Micaela Y Chan; Jennifer Lodi-Smith; Denise C Park
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-04-25

10.  Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality.

Authors:  Hannah B Waldfogel; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington; Oliver P Hauser; Arnold K Ho; Nour S Kteily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.