Literature DB >> 21239008

Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.

Scott E Eggener1, Peter T Scardino, Patrick C Walsh, Misop Han, Alan W Partin, Bruce J Trock, Zhaoyong Feng, David P Wood, James A Eastham, Ofer Yossepowitch, Danny M Rabah, Michael W Kattan, Changhong Yu, Eric A Klein, Andrew J Stephenson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Long-term prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy is poorly defined in the era of widespread screening. An understanding of the treated natural history of screen detected cancers and the pathological risk factors for prostate cancer specific mortality are needed for treatment decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis we modeled clinical and pathological data, and followup information on 11,521 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a total of 4 academic centers from 1987 to 2005 to predict prostate cancer specific mortality. The model was validated on 12,389 patients treated at a separate institution during the same period. Median followup in the modeling and validation cohorts was 56 and 96 months, respectively.
RESULTS: The overall 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality rate was 7%. Primary and secondary Gleason grade 4-5 (each p<0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p<0.001) and surgery year (p=0.002) were significant predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality. A nomogram predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality based on standard pathological parameters was accurate and discriminating with an externally validated concordance index of 0.92. When stratified by patient age at diagnosis, the 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality rate for pathological Gleason score 6 or less, 3+4, 4+3 and 8-10 was 0.2% to 1.2%, 4.2% to 6.5%, 6.6% to 11% and 26% to 37%, respectively. The 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality risk was 0.8% to 1.5%, 2.9% to 10%, 15% to 27% and 22% to 30% for organ confined cancer, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node metastasis, respectively. Only 3 of 9,557 patients with organ confined, pathological Gleason score 6 or less cancer died of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Poorly differentiated cancer and seminal vesicle invasion are the prime determinants of prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. The prostate cancer specific mortality risk can be predicted with remarkable accuracy after the pathological features of prostate cancer are known.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21239008      PMCID: PMC4058776          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

Review 1.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Messing; J Manola; M Sarosdy; G Wilding; E D Crawford; D Trump
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Ming-Hui Chen; David McLeod; Peter R Carroll; Judd W Moul; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; Judith Fine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Ming-Hui Chen; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Michael W Kattan; Elyn Riedel; Colin B Begg; Thomas M Wheeler; Claudia Gerigk; Mithat Gonen; Victor Reuter; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  186 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Application of metabolomics to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: an updated view.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A new standard for radical prostatectomy in Ireland?

Authors:  D G Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Deriving benefit of early detection from biomarker-based prognostic models.

Authors:  L Y T Inoue; R Gulati; C Yu; M W Kattan; R Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.

Authors:  Shivani Pahwa; Nicholas K Schiltz; Lee E Ponsky; Ziang Lu; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Intraoperative 68Ga-PSMA Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging for Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christopher Darr; Nina N Harke; Jan Philipp Radtke; Leubet Yirga; Claudia Kesch; Maarten R Grootendorst; Wolfgang P Fendler; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Christoph Rischpler; Christine Praus; Johannes Haubold; Henning Reis; Thomas Hager; Ken Herrmann; Ina Binse; Boris Hadaschik
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  A four-gene transcript score to predict metastatic-lethal progression in men treated for localized prostate cancer: Development and validation studies.

Authors:  Anqi Cheng; Shanshan Zhao; Liesel M FitzGerald; Jonathan L Wright; Suzanne Kolb; R Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Jenkins; Elai Davicioni; Elaine A Ostrander; Ziding Feng; Jian-Bing Fan; James Y Dai; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.