Literature DB >> 25991476

Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores.

Andreas Wibmer1, Hedvig Hricak, Tatsuo Gondo, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Harini Veeraraghavan, Duc Fehr, Junting Zheng, Debra Goldman, Chaya Moskowitz, Samson W Fine, Victor E Reuter, James Eastham, Evis Sala, Hebert Alberto Vargas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI for cancer detection and differentiating Gleason scores (GS).
METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven patients underwent T2- weighted (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI. Cancers ≥0.5 ml and non-cancerous peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zone tissue were identified on T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, using whole-mount pathology as reference. Texture features (Energy, Entropy, Correlation, Homogeneity, Inertia) were extracted and analysed using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: PZ cancers (n = 143) showed higher Entropy and Inertia and lower Energy, Correlation and Homogeneity compared to non-cancerous tissue on T2WI and ADC maps (p-values: <.0001-0.008). In TZ cancers (n = 43) we observed significant differences for all five texture features on the ADC map (all p-values: <.0001) and for Correlation (p = 0.041) and Inertia (p = 0.001) on T2WI. On ADC maps, GS was associated with higher Entropy (GS 6 vs. 7: p = 0.0225; 6 vs. >7: p = 0.0069) and lower Energy (GS 6 vs. 7: p = 0.0116, 6 vs. >7: p = 0.0039). ADC map Energy (p = 0.0102) and Entropy (p = 0.0019) were significantly different in GS ≤3 + 4 versus ≥4 + 3 cancers; ADC map Entropy remained significant after controlling for the median ADC (p = 0.0291).
CONCLUSION: Several Haralick-based texture features appear useful for prostate cancer detection and GS assessment. KEY POINTS: • Several Haralick texture features may differentiate non-cancerous and cancerous prostate tissue. • Tumour Energy and Entropy on ADC maps correlate with Gleason score. • T2w-image-derived texture features are not associated with the Gleason score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25991476      PMCID: PMC5026307          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit.

Authors:  Terry S Yoo; Michael J Ackerman; William E Lorensen; Will Schroeder; Vikram Chalana; Stephen Aylward; Dimitris Metaxas; Ross Whitaker
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Emilie Niaf; Olivier Rouvière; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Flavie Bratan; Carole Lartizien
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Henkjan J Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Analysis of ultrasonographic prostate images for the detection of prostatic carcinoma: the automated urologic diagnostic expert system.

Authors:  A L Huynen; R J Giesen; J J de la Rosette; R G Aarnink; F M Debruyne; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.

Authors:  Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Cheng Yang; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Tatjana Antic; Ila Sethi; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Maryellen L Giger; Scott E Eggener; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Manish A Vira; Baris Turkbey; Mathew Fakhoury; Oksana Yaskiv; Robert Villani; Eran Ben-Levi; Ardeshir R Rastinehad
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  N M deSouza; S F Riches; N J Vanas; V A Morgan; S A Ashley; C Fisher; G S Payne; C Parker
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  130 in total

1.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Quantitative imaging of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian J Konopka; Marcin Woźniak; Jamila Hedhli; Anna Siekierzycka; Jarosław Skokowski; Rafał Pęksa; Marcin Matuszewski; Gnanasekar Munirathinam; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Iwona T Dobrucki; Leszek Kalinowski; Lawrence W Dobrucki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Classification of suspicious lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI using machine learning.

Authors:  Deukwoo Kwon; Isildinha M Reis; Adrian L Breto; Yohann Tschudi; Nicole Gautney; Olmo Zavala-Romero; Christopher Lopez; John C Ford; Sanoj Punnen; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Preoperative Prediction of Extracapsular Extension: Radiomics Signature Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Stage Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shuai Ma; Huihui Xie; Huihui Wang; Jiejin Yang; Chao Han; Xiaoying Wang; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI.

Authors:  Prathyush Chirra; Patrick Leo; Michael Yim; B Nicolas Bloch; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Andrei Purysko; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-14

6.  Machine learning-based texture analysis for differentiation of radiologically indeterminate small adrenal tumors on adrenal protocol CT scans.

Authors:  Ahmed W Moawad; Ayahallah Ahmed; David T Fuentes; John D Hazle; Mouhammed A Habra; Khaled M Elsayes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 7.  [MRI of the prostate].

Authors:  D Nörenberg; O Solyanik; B Schlenker; G Magistro; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; M F Reiser; M D'Anastasi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Detection of prostate cancer in multiparametric MRI using random forest with instance weighting.

Authors:  Nathan Lay; Yohannes Tsehay; Matthew D Greer; Baris Turkbey; Jin Tae Kwak; Peter L Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-12

9.  An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Felix Chinea; Deukwoo Kwon; Isildinha M Reis; Yohann Tschudi; Nestor A Parra; Adrian L Breto; Kyle R Padgett; Alan Dal Pra; Matthew C Abramowitz; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Sanoj Punnen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Duc Fehr; Harini Veeraraghavan; Andreas Wibmer; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.