Literature DB >> 21960175

Multimodal wavelet embedding representation for data combination (MaWERiC): integrating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prostate cancer detection.

P Tiwari1, S Viswanath, J Kurhanewicz, A Sridhar, A Madabhushi.   

Abstract

Recently, both Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging (MRI) and Spectroscopy (MRS) have emerged as promising tools for detection of prostate cancer (CaP). However, due to the inherent dimensionality differences in MR imaging and spectral information, quantitative integration of T(2) weighted MRI (T(2)w MRI) and MRS for improved CaP detection has been a major challenge. In this paper, we present a novel computerized decision support system called multimodal wavelet embedding representation for data combination (MaWERiC) that employs, (i) wavelet theory to extract 171 Haar wavelet features from MRS and 54 Gabor features from T(2)w MRI, (ii) dimensionality reduction to individually project wavelet features from MRS and T(2)w MRI into a common reduced Eigen vector space, and (iii), a random forest classifier for automated prostate cancer detection on a per voxel basis from combined 1.5 T in vivo MRI and MRS. A total of 36 1.5 T endorectal in vivo T(2)w MRI and MRS patient studies were evaluated per voxel by MaWERiC using a three-fold cross validation approach over 25 iterations. Ground truth for evaluation of results was obtained by an expert radiologist annotations of prostate cancer on a per voxel basis who compared each MRI section with corresponding ex vivo wholemount histology sections with the disease extent mapped out on histology. Results suggest that MaWERiC based MRS T(2)w meta-classifier (mean AUC, μ = 0.89 ± 0.02) significantly outperformed (i) a T(2)w MRI (using wavelet texture features) classifier (μ = 0.55 ± 0.02), (ii) a MRS (using metabolite ratios) classifier (μ = 0.77 ± 0.03), (iii) a decision fusion classifier obtained by combining individual T(2)w MRI and MRS classifier outputs (μ = 0.85 ± 0.03), and (iv) a data combination method involving a combination of metabolic MRS and MR signal intensity features (μ = 0.66 ± 0.02).
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21960175      PMCID: PMC3298634          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  53 in total

1.  Random forest based lung nodule classification aided by clustering.

Authors:  S L A Lee; A Z Kouzani; E J Hu
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Integrated diagnostics: a conceptual framework with examples.

Authors:  Anant Madabhushi; Scott Doyle; George Lee; Ajay Basavanhally; James Monaco; Steve Masters; John Tomaszewski; Michael Feldman
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Loren W Nolte; Jay A Baker; Carey E Floyd; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A hierarchical spectral clustering and nonlinear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

Authors:  Pallavi Tiwari; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  In vivo proton MR spectroscopy reveals altered metabolite content in malignant prostate tissue.

Authors:  A Heerschap; G J Jager; M van der Graaf; J O Barentsz; J J de la Rosette; G O Oosterhof; E T Ruijter; S H Ruijs
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  K K Yu; J Scheidler; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; R G Males; S J Nelson; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Pieter C Vos; Thomas Hambrock; Jelle O Barenstz; Henkjan J Huisman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.

Authors:  Juyoung A Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Daniel B Vigneron; Mark G Swanson; Aliya Qayyum; Vivian Weinberg; Kirk D Jones; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Classification of brain tumours using short echo time 1H MR spectra.

Authors:  A Devos; L Lukas; J A K Suykens; L Vanhamme; A R Tate; F A Howe; C Majós; A Moreno-Torres; M van der Graaf; C Arús; S Van Huffel
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  27 in total

1.  A Deep Learning-Based Approach for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer in T2 Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Ruba Alkadi; Fatma Taher; Ayman El-Baz; Naoufel Werghi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  MRI-based prostate cancer detection with high-level representation and hierarchical classification.

Authors:  Yulian Zhu; Li Wang; Mingxia Liu; Chunjun Qian; Ambereen Yousuf; Aytekin Oto; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Automated prostate cancer detection using T2-weighted and high-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Fully Automated Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion via a Probabilistic Registration Metric.

Authors:  Rachel Sparks; B Nicolas Bloch; Ernest Feleppa; Dean Barratt; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-08

5.  Multi-kernel graph embedding for detection, Gleason grading of prostate cancer via MRI/MRS.

Authors:  Pallavi Tiwari; John Kurhanewicz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Radiomic features from the peritumoral brain parenchyma on treatment-naïve multi-parametric MR imaging predict long versus short-term survival in glioblastoma multiforme: Preliminary findings.

Authors:  Prateek Prasanna; Jay Patel; Sasan Partovi; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Duc Fehr; Harini Veeraraghavan; Andreas Wibmer; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Vijay Shah; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Yuxi Pang; Thomas Pohida; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Class-specific weighting for Markov random field estimation: application to medical image segmentation.

Authors:  James P Monaco; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.