Literature DB >> 26553207

Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions.

Jeffrey Adler1, Douglas J Robertson2,3.   

Abstract

There is good evidence that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been successful at reducing both CRC incidence and death. Colonoscopy, utilized as either a primary screening tool or a follow-up exam when other screening tests are positive, has significantly contributed to these encouraging trends. However, it is well recognized that colonoscopy is not perfectly sensitive for the detection of neoplasia and that CRC can be diagnosed within a short interval following a colonoscopy that did not detect one. The literature surrounding these cases has rapidly expanded over the last decade. Specifically, studies aimed at understanding the frequency of these events and the likely explanations for their occurrence have been performed. This review will highlight current knowledge around the epidemiology of interval post colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). The common explanations for these cancers including missed lesions, new lesions, and incompletely resected lesions will be reviewed and their contribution to interval PCCRC estimated. Finally, the relationship of these putative explanations to potential opportunities to prevent interval PCCRC will be explored. Current approaches to prevention largely center on consistent adherence to quality colonoscopy standards. Future approaches include advances in technology to better visualize the colon and adequately resect detected neoplasia. Finally, improvement in training as well as development of a culture of continuous quality improvement will be essential to maximize the benefits of colonoscopy in daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26553207     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  78 in total

1.  Evaluating changes in gastrointestinal endoscopy training over 5 years: closing the audit loop.

Authors:  Adam V Haycock; Jaymin H Patel; Paris P Tekkis; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Fang Xu; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan; Mark D Schluchter; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Serrated route to colorectal cancer: back street or super highway?

Authors:  J R Jass
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Risk factors associated with missed colorectal flat adenoma: a multicenter retrospective tandem colonoscopy study.

Authors:  Li Xiang; Qiang Zhan; Xin-Hua Zhao; Ya-Dong Wang; Sheng-Li An; Yang-Zhi Xu; Ai-Min Li; Wei Gong; Yang Bai; Fa-Chao Zhi; Si-De Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erwin Biecker; Martin Floer; Achim Heinecke; Philipp Ströbel; Rita Böhme; Michael Schepke; Tobias Meister
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice.

Authors:  David F Ransohoff; Bonnie Yankaskas; Ziya Gizlice; Lisa Gangarosa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.

Authors:  M Leaper; M J Johnston; M Barclay; B R Dobbs; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  29 in total

1.  Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography.

Authors:  P J Pickhardt; B D Pooler; K A Matkowskyj; D H Kim; W M Grady; R B Halberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Rohan Mandaliya; Kamal Baig; Michele Barnhill; Vagishwari Murugesan; Aniruddh Som; Usman Mohammed; Khushali Jhaveri; Shiva Shankar Vangimalla; Allyson Raymond; Jennifer Tran; Lubaba Hasan; James H Lewis; Won Cho
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Editorial: On the Quality of Quality Metrics: Rethinking What Defines a Good Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jason A Dominitz; Brennan Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  The incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a retrospective long-term cohort study using a colonoscopy database.

Authors:  Ayako Nakada; Ryota Niikura; Atsuo Yamada; Shuntaro Yoshida; Yoshihiro Hirata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.

Authors:  Melissa Magrath; Edward Yang; Chul Ahn; Christian A Mayorga; Purva Gopal; Caitlin C Murphy; Samir Gupta; Deepak Agrawal; Ethan A Halm; Eric K Borton; Celette Sugg Skinner; Amit G Singal
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Clear colonoscopy as a surveillance tool in the prediction and reduction of advanced neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qisheng Zhang; Yucui Shen; Jianhua Xu; Peng Gao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Ifeanyi Mbah; Jennifer M Weiss; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Intestinal bacterium-derived cyp27a1 prevents colon cancer cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Yan-Chao Ji; Chang Liu; Xia Zhang; Cheng-Sen Zhang; Dong Wang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.

Authors:  Jong Yoon Lee; Myeongseok Koh; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.