Literature DB >> 20854818

Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Nancy N Baxter1, Rinku Sutradhar, Shawn S Forbes, Lawrence F Paszat, Refik Saskin, Linda Rabeneck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most quality indicators for colonoscopy measure processes; little is known about their relationship to patient outcomes. We investigated whether characteristics of endoscopists, determined from administrative data, are associated with development of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC).
METHODS: We identified individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Ontario from 2000 to 2005 using the Ontario Cancer Registry. We determined performance of colonoscopy using Ontario Health Insurance Plan data. Patients who had complete colonoscopies 7 to 36 months before diagnosis were defined as having a PCCRC. Patients who had complete colonoscopies within 6 months of diagnosis had detected cancers. We determined if endoscopist factors (volume, polypectomy and completion rate, specialization, and setting) were associated with PCCRC using logistic regression, controlling for potential covariates.
RESULTS: In the study, 14,064 patients had a colonoscopy examination within 36 months of diagnosis; 584 (6.8%) with distal and 676 (12.4%) with proximal tumors had PCCRC. The endoscopist's specialty (nongastroenterologist/nongeneral surgeon) and setting (non-hospital-based colonoscopy) were associated with PCCRC. Those who underwent colonoscopy by an endoscopist with a high completion rate were less likely to have a PCCRC (distal: odds ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.97; P = .03; proximal: OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .002). Patients with proximal cancers undergoing colonoscopy by endoscopists who performed polypectomies at high rates had a lower risk of PCCRC (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.89; P < .0001). Endoscopist volume was not associated with PCCRC.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist characteristics derived from administrative data are associated with development of PCCRC and have potential use as quality indicators.
Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20854818     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  156 in total

1.  Endoscopy training in Canada in general surgery residency programs: ways forward.

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Quality in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Katherine T Brunner; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-10

3.  Improving Endoscopic Adherence to Quality Metrics in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Lu; Christopher H Decker; Sean E Connolly
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

4.  Indicators of safety compromise in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Mark Ram Borgaonkar; Lawrence Hookey; Roger Hollingworth; Ernst J Kuipers; Alan Forster; David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Donald Macintosh; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Roland Valori
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Approach to Incomplete Colonoscopy: New Techniques and Technologies.

Authors:  Diana L Franco; Jonathan A Leighton; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-08

7.  Validation of methylation biomarkers that distinguish normal colon mucosa of cancer patients from normal colon mucosa of patients without cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Cesaroni; Jasmine Powell; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-05-07

8.  Annual colonoscopy volume and maintenance of competency for surgeons.

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Brad Evans; Curtis Marcoux; Muna Lougheed; Vanessa Falk; Nikita Hickey; Meghan O'Leary; Jerry McGrath; Darrel Boone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening quality, cost and practice in an era of healthcare transformation.

Authors:  Martin Brotman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.