Literature DB >> 21989586

Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries.

Gregory S Cooper1, Fang Xu, Jill S Barnholtz Sloan, Mark D Schluchter, Siran M Koroukian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After a colonoscopy that is negative for cancer, a subset of patients may be diagnosed with colorectal cancer, also termed interval cancer. The frequency and predictors have not been well studied in a population-based US cohort.
METHODS: The authors used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify 57,839 patients aged ≥ 69 years who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1994 and 2005 and who underwent colonoscopy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis. Colonoscopy performed between 6 and 36 months before cancer diagnosis was a proxy for interval cancer.
RESULTS: By using the case definition, 7.2% of patients developed interval cancers. Factors that were associated with interval cancers included proximal tumor location (distal colon: multivariable odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.390-0.46; rectum: OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.42-0.53), increased comorbidity (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.68 2.14 for ≥ 3 comorbidities), a previous diagnosis of diverticulosis (OR, 6.00; 95% CI, 5.57-6.46), and prior polypectomy (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.62-1.87). Risk factors at the endoscopist level included a lower polypectomy rate (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.78 for the highest quartile), higher colonoscopy volume (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.43), and specialty other than gastroenterology (colorectal surgery: OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16-1.83; general surgery: OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.24-1.62; internal medicine: OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17-1.63; family practice: OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.35).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients developed interval colorectal cancer, particularly in the proximal colon. Contributing factors likely included both procedural and biologic factors, emphasizing the importance of meticulous examination of the mucosa.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989586      PMCID: PMC3258472          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  41 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals.

Authors:  J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Different mechanisms in the tumorigenesis of proximal and distal colon cancers.

Authors:  A Lindblom
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B C Morson; J Cuzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  False-negative barium enema in patients with sigmoid cancer and coexistent diverticula.

Authors:  S R Baker; D D Alterman
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985

9.  Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Joan L Warren; Julie M Legler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  77 in total

1.  Endoscopy services and training: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali; Christopher de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Association between diverticulosis and colonic neoplastic lesions in individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test.

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Lorenzo Ridola; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Roberto Boggi; Massimo Napoli; Silverio Tomao; Angelo Zullo
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Benchmarking and quality-screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  Protective association of colonoscopy against proximal and distal colon cancer and patterns in interval cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Erin E Conners; Kenneth R McQuaid; Sara Epstein; James C Ryan; Janak N Shah; John Inadomi; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  HD chromoendoscopy coupled with DNA mass spectrometry profiling identifies somatic mutations in microdissected human proximal aberrant crypt foci.

Authors:  David A Drew; Thomas J Devers; Michael J O'Brien; Nicole A Horelik; Joel Levine; Daniel W Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Quality of Colonoscopy Performed in Rural Practice: Experience From the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative and the Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Jennifer L Holub; Cynthia Morris; Lyle J Fagnan; Judith R Logan; LeAnn C Michaels; David A Lieberman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Intraprocedural Cleansing for Screening Colonoscopy: Avoiding Brownouts.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Trouble in Paris (classification): polyp morphology is in the eye of the beholder.

Authors:  Samir Gupta
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Administrative Database Research Overestimates the Rate of Interval Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Gotfried; Marc Bernstein; Adam C Ehrlich; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.