Literature DB >> 27151122

Editorial: On the Quality of Quality Metrics: Rethinking What Defines a Good Colonoscopy.

Jason A Dominitz1, Brennan Spiegel2.   

Abstract

The colonoscopy quality assurance movement has focused on a variety of process metrics, including the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the ADR only ascertains whether or not at least one adenoma is identified. Supplemental measures that quantify all neoplasia have been proposed. In this issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Aniwan and colleagues performed tandem screening colonoscopies to determine the adenoma miss rate among high-ADR endoscopists. This permitted validation of supplemental colonoscopy quality metrics. This study highlights potential limitations of ADR and the need for further refinement of colonoscopy quality metrics, although logistic challenges abound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27151122     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  19 in total

1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Andrew Taber; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: results from VA Cooperative Studies Program 380.

Authors:  Ziad F Gellad; David G Weiss; Dennis J Ahnen; David A Lieberman; George L Jackson; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Clinical decision support with natural language processing facilitates determination of colonoscopy surveillance intervals.

Authors:  Timothy D Imler; Justin Morea; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Chyke A Doubeni; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Christopher D Jensen; Miriam P van der Meulen; Theodore R Levin; Virginia P Quinn; Joanne E Schottinger; Ann G Zauber; Douglas A Corley; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The natural history of adenomas.

Authors:  Mauro Risio
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.043

8.  Natural language processing accurately categorizes findings from colonoscopy and pathology reports.

Authors:  Timothy D Imler; Justin Morea; Charles Kahi; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.

Authors:  Hank S Wang; Joseph Pisegna; Rusha Modi; Li-Jung Liang; Mary Atia; Minh Nguyen; Hartley Cohen; Gordon Ohning; Martijn van Oijen; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Mary C White; Trevor D Thompson; Carrie N Klabunde
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer due to incomplete adenoma resection: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tim Dg Belderbos; Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Max Leenders; Marguerite Ei Schipper; Peter D Siersema; Martijn Gh van Oijen
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  The Countdown to a Paradigm Shift in Diagnosing Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Enhanced Patient Education for Colonic Polyp and Adenoma Detection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xu Tian; Ling-Li Xu; Xiao-Ling Liu; Wei-Qing Chen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Adenoma miss rate of polypectomy-referring hospitals is high in Korea.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Seo; Bo-In Lee; Kyungjin Lee; Jae Myung Park; Jin Soo Kim; Young-Seok Cho; Kang-Moon Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Hwang Choi; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.884

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.