Literature DB >> 27552558

Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm.

Perry J Pickhardt1, B Dustin Pooler1, Ifeanyi Mbah1, Jennifer M Weiss1, David H Kim1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the rate and types of polyps detected at repeat computed tomographic (CT) colonography screening after initial negative findings at CT colonography screening. Materials and Methods Among 5640 negative CT colonography screenings (no polyps ≥ 6 mm) performed before 2010 at one medical center, 1429 (25.3%; mean age, 61.4 years; 736 women, 693 men) patients have returned for repeat CT colonography screening (mean interval, 5.7 years ± 0.9; range, 4.5-10.7 years). Positive rates and histologic findings of initial and repeat screening were compared in this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study. For all patients with positive findings at repeat CT colonography, the findings were directly compared against the initial CT colonography findings. Fisher exact, Pearson χ2, and Student t tests were applied as indicated. Results Repeat CT colonography screening was positive for lesions 6 mm or larger in 173 (12.1%) adults (compared with 14.3% at initial CT colonography screening, P = .29). In the 173 patients, 29.5% (61 of 207) of nondiminutive polyps could be identified as diminutive at the initial CT colonography and 12.6% (26 of 207) were missed. Large polyps, advanced neoplasia (advanced adenomas and cancer), and invasive cancer were seen in 3.8% (55 of 1429), 2.8% (40 of 1429), and 0.14% (two of 1429), respectively, at follow-up, compared with 5.2% (P = .02), 3.2% (P = .52), and 0.45% (P = .17), respectively, at initial screening. Of 42 advanced lesions in 40 follow-up screenings, 33 (78.6%) were right sided and 22 (52.4%) were flat, compared with 45.4% (P < .001) and 11.3% (P < .001), respectively, at initial screening. Large right-sided serrated lesions were confirmed in 20 individuals (1.4%), compared with 0.5% (P < .001) confirmed at initial screening. Conclusion Positive rates for large polyps at repeat CT colonography screening (3.7%) were lower compared with those at initial screening (5.2%). However, more advanced right-sided lesions were detected at follow-up CT colonography, many of which were flat, serrated lesions. The cumulative findings support both the nonreporting of diminutive lesions and a 5-10-year screening interval. © RSNA, 2016 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on August 30, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552558      PMCID: PMC5207120          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  38 in total

1.  The effect of diagnostic confidence on the probability of optical colonoscopic confirmation of potential polyps detected on CT colonography: prospective assessment in 1,339 asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Pamela A Nugent; William R Schindler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Performance of CT colonography for detecting small, diminutive, and flat polyps.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

3.  Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Vu P Lam; Jennifer M Weiss; Gregory D Kennedy; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Screening CT colonography: how I do it.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Flat (nonpolypoid) colorectal lesions identified at CT colonography in a U.S. screening population.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Jessica B Robbins
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Andrew J Taylor; David H Kim; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Contrast coating for the surface of flat polyps at CT colonography: a marker for detection.

Authors:  David H Kim; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; B Dustin Pooler; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; J Louis Hinshaw; Duncan Barlow; Don Jensen; Mark Reichelderfer; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Pamela A Nugent; J Richard Choi; William R Schindler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography.

Authors:  P J Pickhardt; B D Pooler; K A Matkowskyj; D H Kim; W M Grady; R B Halberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 3.  CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Judy Yee; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Using CT Colonography.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

5.  Computed Tomography Colonography Less Costly Than Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening of Commercially Insured Patients.

Authors:  Tia Goss Sawhney; Bruce S Pyenson; David Rotter; Michele Berrios; Judy Yee
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2018-10

6.  Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Karen M Kuntz; Jonah Popp; J Robert Beck; Ann G Zauber; David S Weinberg
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.