Literature DB >> 31152331

Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.

Rohan Mandaliya1, Kamal Baig2, Michele Barnhill2, Vagishwari Murugesan3, Aniruddh Som3, Usman Mohammed3, Khushali Jhaveri3, Shiva Shankar Vangimalla3, Allyson Raymond4, Jennifer Tran3, Lubaba Hasan3, James H Lewis1, Won Cho5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have demonstrated that the protective effect of colonoscopy against colorectal cancer is lower in the proximal colon. Proximal serrated polyps, including sessile serrated adenomas and proximal hyperplastic polyps, can be frequently missed and pose a risk of interval cancers. AIM: To investigate the overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) and the proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons from a single institution, all of whom have received formal training in colonoscopy during their fellowship.
METHODS: All complete screening colonoscopies for patients aged 50 or older with a good to excellent bowel preparation performed by different endoscopists at Medstar Washington Hospital Center (Washington, DC) from July 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed. Pathology reports of the resected polyps were manually reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 2850 screening colonoscopies meeting the inclusion criteria were performed by 18 endoscopists (6 academic, 7 community, and 5 colorectal surgeons). There was no significant difference in the mean ADR among the three groups of endoscopists: academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons (40.3% vs 36.0% vs 39.6%, respectively). However, academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons (12.3% vs 5.4% vs 4.5%, respectively, ANOVA p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Our novel data show that academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons despite a comparable overall ADR among the three groups. PSPDR may be considered as an important quality indicator for colonoscopy, apart from ADR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection rate; Colon cancer; Colonoscopy; Serrated adenoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31152331     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05664-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  28 in total

1.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; E Robert Greenberg; Michael Beach; Robert S Sandler; Dennis Ahnen; Robert W Haile; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Robert S Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Jack S Mandel; John H Bond; Rosalind U Van Stolk; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Tim Byers; Leila Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Jason A Dominitz; Pam Green; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeroen C van Rijn; Johannes B Reitsma; Jaap Stoker; Patrick M Bossuyt; Sander J van Deventer; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Alain A Demers; Erich V Kliewer; Salaheddin M Mahmud; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort.

Authors:  Jeremy T Hetzel; Christopher S Huang; Jennifer A Coukos; Kelsey Omstead; Sandra R Cerda; Shi Yang; Michael J O'Brien; Francis A Farraye
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle.

Authors:  Mustafa A Arain; Mandeep Sawhney; Shehla Sheikh; Ruth Anway; Bharat Thyagarajan; John H Bond; Aasma Shaukat
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Salaheddin M Mahmud; Alain A Demers; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  6 in total

1.  Proximal Sessile Polyps: Raised Expectations for the Detection of Flat Lesions.

Authors:  Pamela Lu; Adam C Fields; Nelya Melnitchouk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Polyp Detection Rate as a Surrogate for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rates.

Authors:  Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu; Gurfarmaan Singh; Khizar Rana; Masanao Nakamura; Takeshi Yamamura; Sudarshan Krishnamurthi; Amanda Ovenden; Suzanne Edwards; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Yoshiki Hirooka; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Alastair D Burt; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2020-02-11

3.  Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Abhinav Sehgal; Soorya Aggarwal; Rohan Mandaliya; Thomas Loughney; Mark C Mattar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-04-16

4.  Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; William Hisey; Todd A Mackenzie; Christina M Robinson; Amitabh Srivastava; Reinier G S Meester; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 10.396

5.  Automated imaging cytometry reveals dysplastic indices of colonic serrated adenomas.

Authors:  Nicholas S Samel; Qin Huang; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-02-21

Review 6.  Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  Madhav Desai; Joseph C Anderson; Michael Kaminski; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Jihan Fathallah; Cesare Hassan; David Lieberman; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.