Literature DB >> 26499245

Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes.

Adrian L Sanborn1, Suhas S P Rao2, Su-Chen Huang3, Neva C Durand3, Miriam H Huntley3, Andrew I Jewett3, Ivan D Bochkov3, Dharmaraj Chinnappan3, Ashok Cutkosky3, Jian Li4, Kristopher P Geeting3, Andreas Gnirke5, Alexandre Melnikov5, Doug McKenna6, Elena K Stamenova7, Eric S Lander8, Erez Lieberman Aiden9.   

Abstract

We recently used in situ Hi-C to create kilobase-resolution 3D maps of mammalian genomes. Here, we combine these maps with new Hi-C, microscopy, and genome-editing experiments to study the physical structure of chromatin fibers, domains, and loops. We find that the observed contact domains are inconsistent with the equilibrium state for an ordinary condensed polymer. Combining Hi-C data and novel mathematical theorems, we show that contact domains are also not consistent with a fractal globule. Instead, we use physical simulations to study two models of genome folding. In one, intermonomer attraction during polymer condensation leads to formation of an anisotropic "tension globule." In the other, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin act together to extrude unknotted loops during interphase. Both models are consistent with the observed contact domains and with the observation that contact domains tend to form inside loops. However, the extrusion model explains a far wider array of observations, such as why loops tend not to overlap and why the CTCF-binding motifs at pairs of loop anchors lie in the convergent orientation. Finally, we perform 13 genome-editing experiments examining the effect of altering CTCF-binding sites on chromatin folding. The convergent rule correctly predicts the affected loops in every case. Moreover, the extrusion model accurately predicts in silico the 3D maps resulting from each experiment using only the location of CTCF-binding sites in the WT. Thus, we show that it is possible to disrupt, restore, and move loops and domains using targeted mutations as small as a single base pair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; CTCF; chromatin loops; genome architecture; molecular dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26499245      PMCID: PMC4664323          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518552112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Quantitative comparison of DNA looping in vitro and in vivo: chromatin increases effective DNA flexibility at short distances.

Authors:  L Ringrose; S Chabanis; P O Angrand; C Woodroofe; A F Stewart
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome.

Authors:  R D Kornberg; Y Lorch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Computer simulation of the 30-nanometer chromatin fiber.

Authors:  Gero Wedemann; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  How long is the coast of britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension.

Authors:  B Mandelbrot
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes.

Authors:  R K Sachs; G van den Engh; B Trask; H Yokota; J E Hearst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Interaction between transcription regulatory regions of prolactin chromatin.

Authors:  K E Cullen; M P Kladde; M A Seyfred
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Properties of DNA rosettes and their relevance to chromosome structure.

Authors:  P León; G Macaya
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  On the probability of ring closure of lambda DNA.

Authors:  J C Wang; N Davidson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing.

Authors:  Andreas Gnirke; Alexandre Melnikov; Jared Maguire; Peter Rogov; Emily M LeProust; William Brockman; Timothy Fennell; Georgia Giannoukos; Sheila Fisher; Carsten Russ; Stacey Gabriel; David B Jaffe; Eric S Lander; Chad Nusbaum
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  616 in total

1.  Predictive model of 3D domain formation via CTCF-mediated extrusion.

Authors:  Galip Gürkan Yardımcı; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture.

Authors:  Emily M Darrow; Miriam H Huntley; Olga Dudchenko; Elena K Stamenova; Neva C Durand; Zhuo Sun; Su-Chen Huang; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Muhammad Shamim; Andrew P Seberg; Eric S Lander; Brian P Chadwick; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Endothelial cell differentiation is encompassed by changes in long range interactions between inactive chromatin regions.

Authors:  Henri Niskanen; Irina Tuszynska; Rafal Zaborowski; Merja Heinäniemi; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Bartek Wilczynski; Minna U Kaikkonen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  The three-dimensional organization of the genome in cellular senescence and age-associated diseases.

Authors:  Shane A Evans; Jeremy Horrell; Nicola Neretti
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Using contact statistics to characterize structure transformation of biopolymer ensembles.

Authors:  Priyojit Das; Rosela Golloshi; Rachel Patton McCord; Tongye Shen
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.529

Review 6.  Unraveling quiescence-specific repressive chromatin domains.

Authors:  Sarah G Swygert; Toshio Tsukiyama
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Hi-C 2.0: An optimized Hi-C procedure for high-resolution genome-wide mapping of chromosome conformation.

Authors:  Houda Belaghzal; Job Dekker; Johan H Gibcus
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 8.  The Chromatin Landscape of Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Steven W Criscione; Yee Voan Teo; Nicola Neretti
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  The Magnitude of IFN-γ Responses Is Fine-Tuned by DNA Architecture and the Non-coding Transcript of Ifng-as1.

Authors:  Franziska Petermann; Aleksandra Pękowska; Catrina A Johnson; Dragana Jankovic; Han-Yu Shih; Kan Jiang; William H Hudson; Stephen R Brooks; Hong-Wei Sun; Alejandro V Villarino; Chen Yao; Kentner Singleton; Rama S Akondy; Yuka Kanno; Alan Sher; Rafael Casellas; Rafi Ahmed; John J O'Shea
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment.

Authors:  Celeste D Rosencrance; Haneen N Ammouri; Qi Yu; Tiffany Ge; Emily J Rendleman; Stacy A Marshall; Kyle P Eagen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.