Literature DB >> 27432957

Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture.

Emily M Darrow1, Miriam H Huntley2, Olga Dudchenko3, Elena K Stamenova4, Neva C Durand5, Zhuo Sun1, Su-Chen Huang5, Adrian L Sanborn6, Ido Machol5, Muhammad Shamim5, Andrew P Seberg1, Eric S Lander7, Brian P Chadwick8, Erez Lieberman Aiden9.   

Abstract

During interphase, the inactive X chromosome (Xi) is largely transcriptionally silent and adopts an unusual 3D configuration known as the "Barr body." Despite the importance of X chromosome inactivation, little is known about this 3D conformation. We recently showed that in humans the Xi chromosome exhibits three structural features, two of which are not shared by other chromosomes. First, like the chromosomes of many species, Xi forms compartments. Second, Xi is partitioned into two huge intervals, called "superdomains," such that pairs of loci in the same superdomain tend to colocalize. The boundary between the superdomains lies near DXZ4, a macrosatellite repeat whose Xi allele extensively binds the protein CCCTC-binding factor. Third, Xi exhibits extremely large loops, up to 77 megabases long, called "superloops." DXZ4 lies at the anchor of several superloops. Here, we combine 3D mapping, microscopy, and genome editing to study the structure of Xi, focusing on the role of DXZ4 We show that superloops and superdomains are conserved across eutherian mammals. By analyzing ligation events involving three or more loci, we demonstrate that DXZ4 and other superloop anchors tend to colocate simultaneously. Finally, we show that deleting DXZ4 on Xi leads to the disappearance of superdomains and superloops, changes in compartmentalization patterns, and changes in the distribution of chromatin marks. Thus, DXZ4 is essential for proper Xi packaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTCF; Hi‐C; X chromosome inactivation; genome engineering; inactive X chromosome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27432957      PMCID: PMC4978254          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1609643113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Variation in Xi chromatin organization and correlation of the H3K27me3 chromatin territories to transcribed sequences by microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brian P Chadwick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Escape from X inactivation of Smcx is preceded by silencing during mouse development.

Authors:  P A Lingenfelter; D A Adler; D Poslinski; S Thomas; R W Elliott; V M Chapman; C M Disteche
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females.

Authors:  Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes.

Authors:  Adrian L Sanborn; Suhas S P Rao; Su-Chen Huang; Neva C Durand; Miriam H Huntley; Andrew I Jewett; Ivan D Bochkov; Dharmaraj Chinnappan; Ashok Cutkosky; Jian Li; Kristopher P Geeting; Andreas Gnirke; Alexandre Melnikov; Doug McKenna; Elena K Stamenova; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Formation of Chromosomal Domains by Loop Extrusion.

Authors:  Geoffrey Fudenberg; Maxim Imakaev; Carolyn Lu; Anton Goloborodko; Nezar Abdennur; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Escape from X inactivation varies in mouse tissues.

Authors:  Joel B Berletch; Wenxiu Ma; Fan Yang; Jay Shendure; William S Noble; Christine M Disteche; Xinxian Deng
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The mouse DXZ4 homolog retains Ctcf binding and proximity to Pls3 despite substantial organizational differences compared to the primate macrosatellite.

Authors:  Andrea H Horakova; J Mauro Calabrese; Christine R McLaughlin; Deanna C Tremblay; Terry Magnuson; Brian P Chadwick
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  113 in total

1.  A tetrad of chromatin interactions for chromosome pairing in X inactivation.

Authors:  Ivan Krivega; Ann Dean
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  3D mapping and accelerated super-resolution imaging of the human genome using in situ sequencing.

Authors:  Huy Q Nguyen; Shyamtanu Chattoraj; David Castillo; Son C Nguyen; Guy Nir; Antonios Lioutas; Elliot A Hershberg; Nuno M C Martins; Paul L Reginato; Mohammed Hannan; Brian J Beliveau; George M Church; Evan R Daugharthy; Marc A Marti-Renom; C-Ting Wu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Diverse Genome Topologies Characterize Dosage Compensation across Species.

Authors:  William Jordan; Leila E Rieder; Erica Larschan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 4.  The eXceptional nature of the X chromosome.

Authors:  Bradley P Balaton; Thomas Dixon-McDougall; Samantha B Peeters; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus.

Authors:  Sofia A Quinodoz; Noah Ollikainen; Barbara Tabak; Ali Palla; Jan Marten Schmidt; Elizabeth Detmar; Mason M Lai; Alexander A Shishkin; Prashant Bhat; Yodai Takei; Vickie Trinh; Erik Aznauryan; Pamela Russell; Christine Cheng; Marko Jovanovic; Amy Chow; Long Cai; Patrick McDonel; Manuel Garber; Mitchell Guttman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Organization and function of the 3D genome.

Authors:  Boyan Bonev; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression.

Authors:  Jesse M Engreitz; Noah Ollikainen; Mitchell Guttman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  SMCHD1 Merges Chromosome Compartments and Assists Formation of Super-Structures on the Inactive X.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Wang; Teddy Jégu; Hsueh-Ping Chu; Hyun Jung Oh; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment.

Authors:  Celeste D Rosencrance; Haneen N Ammouri; Qi Yu; Tiffany Ge; Emily J Rendleman; Stacy A Marshall; Kyle P Eagen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The 4D nucleome project.

Authors:  Job Dekker; Andrew S Belmont; Mitchell Guttman; Victor O Leshyk; John T Lis; Stavros Lomvardas; Leonid A Mirny; Clodagh C O'Shea; Peter J Park; Bing Ren; Joan C Ritland Politz; Jay Shendure; Sheng Zhong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.