Literature DB >> 8798037

Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

R D Müller1, M Voss, H Hirche, B Buddenbrock, V John, E Bosch.   

Abstract

The extent to which the diagnostic performance of low-dosed storage phosphors can be improved by suitable image postprocessing was investigated. Storage phosphor radiographs and conventional 200- and 400-speed screen-film combinations of an anthropomorphic chest phantom with simulated nodules and linear structures were compared. The detection of test bodies was determined in a ROC analysis based on 16200 individual observations. The two analog screen-film systems did not differ significantly. As far as the storage phosphor radiographs are concerned, a higher diagnostic performance was achieved with a large filter kernel (S 40) whereas small filter kernels and edge-enhanced imaging modes reduced the detection of detail. The image quality of low-dosed storage phosphors is thus similar to high-amplification screen-film combinations if large filter kernels are used in postprocessing of the image.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798037     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Authors:  M Kehler; U Albrechtsson; A Andrésdóttir; I Brådvik; P Hochbergs; H Lárusdóttir; A Lundin
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.

Authors:  L L Fajardo; B J Hillman; G D Pond; R F Carmody; J E Johnson; W R Ferrell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].

Authors:  K F Neufang; B Krug; R Lorenz; W Steinbrich
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1990-05

4.  [ROC: a method for comparing the diagnostic performance of imaging procedures].

Authors:  J W Oestmann; M Galanski
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1989-07

5.  Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.

Authors:  H MacMahon; C J Vyborny; C E Metz; K Doi; V Sabeti; S L Solomon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Pneumothorax and other lung diseases: effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs.

Authors:  L R Goodman; W D Foley; C R Wilson; R S Tikofsky; R G Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.

Authors:  A R Cowen; A Workman; J S Price
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  [Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].

Authors:  R D Müller; V John; M Voss; B Buddenbrock; C Blendl; H Hirche; K Ewen; E Löhr
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1993-07

9.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [Estimation of organ dose during radiological and computer tomographic examinations with calculations of the somatically significant doses (author's transl)].

Authors:  K Ewen; H Steiner; R Jungblut; D Günther; W D Schoppe
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1980-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.