Literature DB >> 17191100

An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.

Su Young Kim1, Yoon Joon Hwang, Yoon Hee Han, Jung Wook Seo, Ji Young Lee, Yong Hoon Kim, Soon Joo Cha, Gham Hur, Sung Soon Lee.   

Abstract

Computed radiography of chest with a 4K image array was recently introduced. We performed a multiobserver study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2K (standard) and 4K (high quality) chest radiographs displayed on a 5-mega-pixel monitor (2K monitor). One hundred cases of posteroanterior chest radiographs (a total of 200 images) were selected by two chest radiologists. Those radiographs included pneumothorax (n = 14), nodules (n = 15), interstitial disease (n = 10), or neither abnormality (n = 61). These were interpreted by four radiologists in two separate sessions. They recorded their confidence scale for the presence or absence of abnormality. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for each observer. ROC analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the 2K and 4K modes for the detection of any of the different abnormalities by individual readers. Our preliminary study suggests that 2K mode would be sufficient for the detection of abnormality on chest radiograph and there is no considerable validity to incline toward the 4K mode in current picture archiving and communication system environment using 2K monitor. However, we think that additional investigation using more subtle parenchymal or rib lesion should be followed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17191100      PMCID: PMC3043916          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-1048-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

1.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.

Authors:  M J Flynn; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging.

Authors:  L L Fajardo; B J Hillman; G D Pond; R F Carmody; J E Johnson; W R Ferrell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.

Authors:  G G Cox; L T Cook; J H McMillan; S J Rosenthal; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.

Authors:  B S Slasky; D Gur; W F Good; M A Costa-Greco; K M Harris; L A Cooperstein; H E Rockette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.

Authors:  A Hayrapetian; D R Aberle; H K Huang; R Fiske; C Morioka; D Valentino; M I Boechat
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.

Authors:  W F Good; D Gur; J H Feist; F L Thaete; C R Fuhrman; C A Britton; B S Slasky
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.

Authors:  Takashi Ueguchi; Takeshi Johkoh; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Osamu Honda; Naoki Mihara; Seiki Hamada; Sachiko Murai; Yuji Ogata; Mitsuhiro Matsumoto; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2005-05

8.  Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.

Authors:  S P Miró; A N Leung; G D Rubin; Y H Choi; S T Kee; R E Mindelzun; P Stark; L Wexler; S K Plevritis; B J Betts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Yin; Q Guo; W Zhang; H Su; J Zhang; Y Yue; C Ding; A Lin; Y Wang; H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.