Literature DB >> 26371072

Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Anay Rajendra Patel1, Brian Barlow2, Amar S Ranawat3.   

Abstract

Stems are intramedullary extensions of either the femoral or tibial component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designed to increase the mechanical stability to decrease the risk of aseptic loosening. Biomechanical studies have shown that TKA stems increase the mechanical stability by transferring load over a larger area and thereby reduce strain at the bone-component interface [1-4]. The length of a revision TKA stem is determined by the patient's anatomy and the intended fixation, namely fully cemented or press-fit cortical contact. The advantages and disadvantages of various stem lengths must be weighed against the needs of the patient to achieve an optimal outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cemented; Fixation; Length; Revision; Stem; Uncemented

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371072      PMCID: PMC4630236          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-015-9297-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  42 in total

Review 1.  Cementless fixation issues in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L A Whiteside
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough?

Authors:  G R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian S Parsley; Nobuhiko Sugano; Roberto Bertolusso; Michael A Conditt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew L Whaley; Robert T Trousdale; James A Rand; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The Walldius hinge arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Phillips; J G Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-02

6.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Skwara; J Figiel; T Knott; J R J Paletta; S Fuchs-Winkelmann; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Effect of Porous Tantalum Cones on Mechanical Alignment and Canal-Fill Ratio in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed with Uncemented Stems.

Authors:  Martin Bédard; Katherine Cabrejo-Jones; Michèle Angers; Rémi Pelletier-Roy; Stéphane Pelet
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques.

Authors:  George J Haidukewych; Arlen Hanssen; Richard Dickey Jones
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties?

Authors:  Paul K Edwards; Thomas K Fehring; William G Hamilton; Brett Perricelli; Walter B Beaver; Susan M Odum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

1.  Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities.

Authors:  M Pietsch; M Hochegger; O Djahani; G Mlaker; M Eder-Halbedl; Th Hofstädter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; Christian Oakley; Jore H Willems; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Petra Heesterbeek; Joshua Rozell; Scott Marwin; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Comparison of radiographic vs. computed tomography canal filling ratio measurement of stems in revision knee prostheses.

Authors:  Osman Cimen; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  Personalizing Revision Tibial Baseplate Position and Stem Trajectory With Custom Implants Using 3D Modeling to Optimize Press-fit Stem Placement.

Authors:  Charlotte Cooperman; Daniel Wiznia; Kunsel Kunsel; Gregory Roytman; Lidia Ani; Donald Pratola; Gwo-Chin Lee; Steven Tommasini; Jenna Bernstein
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

5.  Tapered modular fluted titanium stems for femoral fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; J Bohannon Mason; Aldo M Riesgo; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-04-21

6.  Optimum stem length for mitigation of periprosthetic fracture risk following primary total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study.

Authors:  Noel Conlisk; Colin R Howie; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Indications, Stem Dimensions, and Fixation Methods.

Authors:  Se Gu Kang; Cheol Hee Park; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-09-01

8.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: hybrid vs standard cemented fixation.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Albareda-Albareda; Belén Seral-García; Nieves Blanco-Rubio; Laura Ezquerra-Herrando
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 9.  Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Erhu Li; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

10.  Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bruno Batinica; Scott M Bolam; Matt D'Arcy; Mark Zhu; A Paul Monk; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.025

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.