Literature DB >> 19572121

Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Adrian Skwara1, J Figiel, T Knott, J R J Paletta, S Fuchs-Winkelmann, C O Tibesku.   

Abstract

In spite of improvements in cementing technique, migration of tibial component remains a problem in total knee arthroplasty. This study compares the primary stability of tibial components using two different cementing techniques with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) in vitro. A total of 20 tibia specimens were matched into two groups, 10 specimens per group. Cementing technique was randomized to each group. In the first group only the base and in the second group the base and stem were cemented. The implants and the tibial metaphysis were marked with markers for the RSA analysis. All specimens were tested with an axial load of 2,000 N for 1,000 and 10,000 cycles and RSA analysis was performed. Endpoints for radiosterometric analysis were maximum total point motion, maximum subsidence, lift off, rotation and translation along the x-, y-, and z-axes. After 1,000 and 10,000 cycles, no significant differences could be found, but two tibial components of the surface cementing group showed a migration of more than 2 mm defined as failure compared to six failed tibial components in the full cementing group (P = 0.068). This higher number of failed arthroplasties in the fully cemented prosthesis group demonstrates a disadvantageous load distribution in the tibia apophysis which can cause an early component loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572121     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0849-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  41 in total

1.  Changes in bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: influence of stem design.

Authors:  J H Lonner; M Klotz; C Levitz; P A Lotke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed and stemmed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised RSA study.

Authors:  G Adalberth; K G Nilsson; S Byström; K Kolstad; J Milbrink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-08

3.  Micromotion between the half bearings in the interax prosthesis: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  M Marcacci; R Soavi; I Loreti; L Bragonzoni; F Iacono; A Visani
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Marcis A Craig; R Alexander Mohr; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Fixation of the tibial component using CMW-1 or Palacos bone cement with gentamicin: similar outcome in a randomized radiostereometric study of 51 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Gunnar Adalberth; Kjell G Nilsson; Johan Kärrholm; Helen Hassander
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

6.  Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J D Jennings; M L Laurent; W J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components.

Authors:  Hans Hyldahl; Lars Regnér; Lars Carlsson; Johan Kärrholm; Lars Weidenhielm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses. Stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components.

Authors:  K G Nilsson; J Kärrholm
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface.

Authors:  J P Davies; W H Harris
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  No early tibial tray loosening after surface cementing technique in mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Andrea Ferro; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

4.  Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  J B Seeger; D Haas; S Jäger; E Röhner; S Tohtz; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: hybrid vs standard cemented fixation.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Albareda-Albareda; Belén Seral-García; Nieves Blanco-Rubio; Laura Ezquerra-Herrando
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-17

6.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  10-year follow-up of the Columbus knee prostheses system in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Philip Häussermann; Dirk Hömig; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Tim Klopfer; Christof A Müller; Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.928

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.