Literature DB >> 11716400

Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough?

G R Scuderi1.   

Abstract

Revision total knee arthroplasty is a complex situation that requires meticulous technique to restore a functional outcome. The surgical objective is the same as primary total knee arthroplasty: restore the original anatomy, restore function, and provide a stable joint. To this point of stability, it is preferable to implant the prosthesis with the least degree of constraint. Therefore, in the majority of patients undergoing revision surgery, a posterior-stabilized articulation is used. However, if there is functional loss of the medial collateral ligament or lateral collateral ligament, inability to balance the flexion and extension spaces, or a severe valgus deformity, then a constrained condylar prosthesis is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Level of constraint in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; Nick Giori; William Maloney
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Outcome of iatrogenic collateral ligaments injuries during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Serban Dragosloveanu; Stefan Cristea; Cristian Stoica; Calin Dragosloveanu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Restoration of the distal femur impacts patellar height in revision TKA.

Authors:  Saurabh Khakharia; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Giuseppe Filardo; Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Ibrahim Akkawi; Maria Pia Neri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Inge H F Reininga; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; A Töpfer; J Kircher; H Grundei; P Diehl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Management of intraoperative medial collateral ligament injury during TKA.

Authors:  Gwo-Chin Lee; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Functional outcome following aseptic single-stage revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Nigel T Brewster; Karen Bettinson; James P Holland; David J Weir; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Outcome of knee revisions for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis with postero-stabilized arthroplasties: a mean ten-year follow-up with 90 knee revisions.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.