Literature DB >> 14560408

Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Brian S Parsley1, Nobuhiko Sugano, Roberto Bertolusso, Michael A Conditt.   

Abstract

This multicenter, retrospective study evaluates the radiographic results of achieving optimal tibial alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a single modular CoCr cemented or cementless stemmed implant design. Stem size and length also were evaluated. The hundred ninety-nine revision TKAs were performed between January 1993 and January 1996 by 13 experienced revision knee surgeons. The cases were subdivided into 5 comparative groups: (1) cemented stems, (2) 140-mm length canal-filling stems, (3) 140-mm length non-canal-filling stems, (4) 95-mm length canal-filling stems, and (5) 95-mm length non-canal-filling stems. The anteroposterior (AP) tibial alignment angle was measured. The canal-filling ratio (CFR) was determined by dividing the stem diameter by the endosteal diameter at the stem tip. Overall, the ability to achieve tibial alignment in the AP plane was more predictable when canal-filling (CFR >/= 0.85) cementless stems were used. This was further enhanced when long canal-filling cementless stems were selected. The least-predictable results and the highest probability of varus malalignment were achieved with cemented stems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560408     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00302-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

4.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Defect Reconstruction in Total Knee Arthroplasty with wedges and blocks]. [Corrected].

Authors:  R Hube; T Pfitzner; P von Roth; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  [TKA revision of semiconstraint components using the 3-step technique].

Authors:  R Hube; G Matziolis; T Kalteis; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Comparison of radiographic vs. computed tomography canal filling ratio measurement of stems in revision knee prostheses.

Authors:  Osman Cimen; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-27

8.  Personalizing Revision Tibial Baseplate Position and Stem Trajectory With Custom Implants Using 3D Modeling to Optimize Press-fit Stem Placement.

Authors:  Charlotte Cooperman; Daniel Wiznia; Kunsel Kunsel; Gregory Roytman; Lidia Ani; Donald Pratola; Gwo-Chin Lee; Steven Tommasini; Jenna Bernstein
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

9.  Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Manuel A Sandoval-García
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.