Literature DB >> 26335995

Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter.

Ayoub Daliri1, Ludo Max2.   

Abstract

We previously found that stuttering individuals do not show the typical auditory modulation observed during speech planning in nonstuttering individuals. In this follow-up study, we further elucidate this difference by investigating whether stuttering speakers' atypical auditory modulation is observed only when sensory predictions are based on movement planning or also when predictable auditory input is not a consequence of one's own actions. We recorded 10 stuttering and 10 nonstuttering adults' auditory evoked potentials in response to random probe tones delivered while anticipating either speaking aloud or hearing one's own speech played back and in a control condition without auditory input (besides probe tones). N1 amplitude of nonstuttering speakers was reduced prior to both speaking and hearing versus the control condition. Stuttering speakers, however, showed no N1 amplitude reduction in either the speaking or hearing condition as compared with control. Thus, findings suggest that stuttering speakers have general auditory prediction difficulties.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory cortex; Movement planning; Sensorimotor integration; Speech; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335995      PMCID: PMC4663101          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  39 in total

1.  Gating of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during the preparatory period of self-initiated finger movement.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Minoru Hoshiyama; Hiroki Nakata; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; S Lolley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework.

Authors:  Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events.

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; M Marsel Mesulam; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.

Authors:  Pamela Baess; János Horváth; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Modulation of sensory and motor cortex activity during speech preparation.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines in Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, and Polysomnography.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Martin Sommer; Martin A Koch; Walter Paulus; Cornelius Weiller; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  17 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Stuttering adults' lack of pre-speech auditory modulation normalizes when speaking with delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Perceptual manifestations of auditory modulation during speech planning.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Reza Ebrahimpour; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

6.  The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Authors:  Brianna J McGuffin; Julie M Liss; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Dissociated Development of Speech and Limb Sensorimotor Learning in Stuttering: Speech Auditory-motor Learning is Impaired in Both Children and Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ayoub Daliri; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  A Computational Model for Estimating the Speech Motor System's Sensitivity to Auditory Prediction Errors.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.