Literature DB >> 25796060

Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter.

Ayoub Daliri1, Ludo Max2.   

Abstract

Stuttering is associated with atypical structural and functional connectivity in sensorimotor brain areas, in particular premotor, motor, and auditory regions. It remains unknown, however, which specific mechanisms of speech planning and execution are affected by these neurological abnormalities. To investigate pre-movement sensory modulation, we recorded 12 stuttering and 12 nonstuttering adults' auditory evoked potentials in response to probe tones presented prior to speech onset in a delayed-response speaking condition vs. no-speaking control conditions (silent reading; seeing nonlinguistic symbols). Findings indicate that, during speech movement planning, the nonstuttering group showed a statistically significant modulation of auditory processing (reduced N1 amplitude) that was not observed in the stuttering group. Thus, the obtained results provide electrophysiological evidence in support of the hypothesis that stuttering is associated with deficiencies in modulating the cortical auditory system during speech movement planning. This specific sensorimotor integration deficiency may contribute to inefficient feedback monitoring and, consequently, speech dysfluencies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory cortex; Movement planning; Sensorimotor integration; Speech; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25796060      PMCID: PMC4380808          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  40 in total

1.  The nature and treatment of stuttering as revealed by fMRI A within- and between-group comparison.

Authors:  Katrin Neumann; Harald A Euler; Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg; Anne-Lise Giraud; Heinrich Lanfermann; Volker Gall; Christine Preibisch
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  A positron emission tomography study of short- and long-term treatment effects on functional brain activation in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Luc F De Nil; Robert M Kroll; Sophie J Lafaille; Sylvain Houle
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  A study of the reproducibility and etiology of diffusion anisotropy differences in developmental stuttering: a potential role for impaired myelination.

Authors:  M D Cykowski; P T Fox; R J Ingham; J C Ingham; D A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.

Authors:  Pamela Baess; János Horváth; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering.

Authors:  P T Fox; R J Ingham; J C Ingham; T B Hirsch; J H Downs; C Martin; P Jerabek; T Glass; J L Lancaster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines in Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, and Polysomnography.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Martin Sommer; Martin A Koch; Walter Paulus; Cornelius Weiller; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Individual differences in neural regions functionally related to real and imagined stuttering.

Authors:  Nicholas F Wymbs; Roger J Ingham; Janis C Ingham; Katherine E Paolini; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  25 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Corollary Discharge Mechanisms During Vocal Production in Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-06-29

3.  Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Wendy L Olsen; Daniel Kleinman; Stefan A Frisch; Victor S Ferreira; Jennifer J Lister
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Stuttering adults' lack of pre-speech auditory modulation normalizes when speaking with delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Perceptual manifestations of auditory modulation during speech planning.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Reza Ebrahimpour; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Authors:  Brianna J McGuffin; Julie M Liss; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Deficit or Difference? Effects of Altered Auditory Feedback on Speech Fluency and Kinematic Variability in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  HeeCheong Chon; Eric S Jackson; Shelly Jo Kraft; Nicoline G Ambrose; Torrey M Loucks
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.