Literature DB >> 33675539

Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Kwang S Kim1,2, Ludo Max1,3.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying stuttering remain poorly understood. A large body of work has focused on sensorimotor integration difficulties in individuals who stutter, including recently the capacity for sensorimotor learning. Typically, sensorimotor learning is assessed with adaptation paradigms in which one or more sensory feedback modalities are experimentally perturbed in real time. Our own previous work on speech with perturbed auditory feedback revealed substantial auditory-motor learning limitations in both children and adults who stutter (AWS). It remains unknown, however, which subprocesses of sensorimotor learning are impaired. Indeed, new insights from research on upper limb motor control indicate that sensorimotor learning involves at least two distinct components: (a) an explicit component that includes intentional strategy use and presumably is driven by target error and (b) an implicit component that updates an internal model without awareness of the learner and presumably is driven by sensory prediction error. Here, we attempted to dissociate these components for speech auditory-motor learning in AWS versus adults who do not stutter (AWNS). Our formant-shift auditory-motor adaptation results replicated previous findings that such sensorimotor learning is limited in AWS. Novel findings are that neither control nor stuttering participants reported any awareness of changing their productions in response to the auditory perturbation and that neither group showed systematic drift in auditory target judgments made throughout the adaptation task. These results indicate that speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback relies exclusively on implicit learning processes. Thus, limited adaptation in AWS reflects poor implicit sensorimotor learning. Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.
© 2021 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; auditory feedback; implicit learning; sensorimotor learning; stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675539      PMCID: PMC8259784          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  47 in total

1.  Partial compensation for altered auditory feedback: a tradeoff with somatosensory feedback?

Authors:  Shira Katseff; John Houde; Keith Johnson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; John Houde; Feng Rong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The explicit/implicit distinction in studies of visuomotor learning: Conceptual and methodological pitfalls.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Stuttering adults' lack of pre-speech auditory modulation normalizes when speaking with delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Marcus Y M Quek; Calum B Prescott; John-Stuart Brittain; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-06

10.  Adaptation to visual feedback delay influences visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Takuya Honda; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  White matter tract strength correlates with therapy outcome in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Nicole E Neef; Alexandra Korzeczek; Annika Primaßin; Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg; Peter Dechent; Christian Heiner Riedel; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.399

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.