Literature DB >> 21261757

Modulation of sensory and motor cortex activity during speech preparation.

Jeffrey R Mock1, Anne L Foundas, Edward J Golob.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that speaking affects auditory and motor cortex responsiveness, which may reflect the influence of motor efference copy. If motor efference copy is involved, it would also likely influence auditory and motor cortical activity when preparing to speak. We tested this hypothesis by using auditory event-related potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex. In the speech condition subjects were visually cued to prepare a vocal response to a subsequent target, which was compared to a control condition without speech preparation. Auditory and motor cortex responsiveness at variable times between the cue and target were probed with an acoustic stimulus (Experiment 1, tone or consonant-vowels) or motor cortical TMS (Experiment 2). Acoustic probes delivered shortly before targets elicited a fronto-central negative potential in the speech condition. Current density analysis showed that auditory cortical activity was attenuated at the beginning of the slow potential in the speech condition. Sensory potentials in response to probes had shorter latencies (N100) and larger amplitudes (P200) when consonant-vowels matched the sound of cue words. Motor cortex excitability was greater in the speech than in the control condition at all time points before picture onset. The results suggest that speech preparation induces top-down regulation of sensory and motor cortex responsiveness, with different time courses for auditory and motor systems.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21261757     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07585.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  9 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Perceptual manifestations of auditory modulation during speech planning.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Reza Ebrahimpour; Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Speech preparation in adults with persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Atypical brain torque in boys with developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Jeffrey Ryan Mock; Janet N Zadina; David M Corey; Jeremy D Cohen; Lisa C Lemen; Anne L Foundas
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Modulation of Auditory Responses to Speech vs. Nonspeech Stimuli during Speech Movement Planning.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Sensorimotor Integration Can Enhance Auditory Perception.

Authors:  John C Myers; Jeffrey R Mock; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Microstate ERP Analyses to Pinpoint the Articulatory Onset in Speech Production.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Jouen; Monica Lancheros; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.020

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.