Literature DB >> 11160407

The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning.

J R Flanagan1, S Lolley.   

Abstract

An important theoretical concept in motor control is the idea that the CNS uses an internal model of the motor system and environment to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands. In arm movement control, a critical factor affecting the transformation from motor commands to sensory consequences is limb dynamics, including the inertial anisotropy of the arm, which refers to the fact that the inertial resistance of the arm depends on hand movement direction. Here we show that the CNS maintains an accurate internal model of the inertial anisotropy of the arm by demonstrating that the motor system can precisely predict direction-dependent variations in hand acceleration. Subjects slid an object, held beneath the index finger, across a frictionless horizontal surface to radially located targets. We recorded the normal (vertical) force exerted by the fingertip, as well as the tangential (horizontal) force proportional to hand acceleration. We found that normal force was precisely scaled in anticipation of tangential force, which, as expected, varied with direction. The peak rates of change of the normal and tangential forces, observed early in the movement, were highly correlated. Similar results were obtained regardless of whether the start position of the hand was located directly in front of the subject or rotated 45 degrees to the right. Finally, we observed reduced force correlations under reaction time conditions. This suggests that the process of prediction, based on an internal model of the limb, is not fully completed within the reaction time interval.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11160407      PMCID: PMC6762220     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

2.  Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion.

Authors:  R W SPERRY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1950-12

3.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Postural dependence of muscle actions: implications for neural control.

Authors:  C A Buneo; J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool.

Authors:  H Imamizu; S Miyauchi; T Tamada; Y Sasaki; R Takino; B Pütz; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement.

Authors:  H Gomi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  30 in total

1.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The time course for kinetic versus kinematic planning of goal-directed human motor behavior.

Authors:  Michael Vesia; Helena Vander; Xiaogang Yan; Lauren E Sergio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  How dependent are grip force and arm actions during holding an object?

Authors:  F Danion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Evidence for predictive control in lifting series of virtual objects.

Authors:  Firas Mawase; Amir Karniel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus.

Authors:  Christian Dohle; Klaus Martin Stephan; Jakob T Valvoda; Omid Hosseiny; Lutz Tellmann; Torsten Kuhlen; Rüdiger J Seitz; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differential exploitation of the inertia tensor in multi-joint arm reaching.

Authors:  Delphine Bernardin; Brice Isableu; Paul Fourcade; Benoît G Bardy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Negative viscosity can enhance learning of inertial dynamics.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.