Literature DB >> 21449953

Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.

Pamela Baess1, János Horváth, Thomas Jacobsen, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that the N1 event-related potential (ERP) response is attenuated when it is elicited by self-initiated sounds. This N1 suppression effect is generally interpreted to reflect an internal prediction mechanism, which enables the discrimination of the sensory consequences of our own actions and those of others. The blocked design used in the forerunner studies (i.e., self- and externally initiated sounds presented in different blocks) seriously limits the relevance of these findings, because the N1 effect can simply be explained by contextual task differences. In the present study, self- and externally initiated sounds were mixed within blocks. N1 suppression was found, and its magnitude was even larger than that observed in a traditional blocked condition. This result supports the involvement of an internal prediction mechanism in the discrimination of the sensory consequences of one's own actions and those of others.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21449953     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01196.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  47 in total

Review 1.  Anticipating the future: automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Studying auditory verbal hallucinations using the RDoC framework.

Authors:  Judith M Ford
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Did I do that? Abnormal predictive processes in schizophrenia when button pressing to deliver a tone.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Vanessa A Palzes; Brian J Roach; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Precise force controls enhance loudness discrimination of self-generated sound.

Authors:  Nozomi Endo; Takayuki Ito; Takemi Mochida; Tetsuya Ijiri; Katsumi Watanabe; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cortical Predictive Mechanisms of Auditory Response Attenuation to Self-Generated Sounds.

Authors:  Matthew G Phillips; Stephen C Lenzi; Jesse P Geerts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by expected sound intensity.

Authors:  Daniel Reznik; Yael Henkin; Osnat Levy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  My partner is also on my mind: social context modulates the N1 response.

Authors:  Pamela Baess; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Surmising synchrony of sound and sight: Factors explaining variance of audiovisual integration in hurdling, tap dancing and drumming.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Stefan Vinbrüx; Ima Trempler; Axel Kohler; Katja Kornysheva; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.