Literature DB >> 32697611

The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.

Brianna J McGuffin1, Julie M Liss1, Ayoub Daliri1.   

Abstract

Purpose In our previous studies, we showed that the brain modulates the auditory system, and the modulation starts during speech planning. However, it remained unknown whether the brain uses similar mechanisms to modulate the orofacial somatosensory system. Here, we developed a novel behavioral paradigm to (a) examine whether the somatosensory system is modulated during speech planning and (b) determine the somatosensory modulation's time course during planning and production. Method Participants (N = 20) completed two experiments in which we applied electrical current stimulation to the lower lip to induce somatosensory sensation. In the first experiment, we used a staircase method (one-up, four-down) to determine each participant's perceptual threshold at rest (i.e., the stimulus that the participant detected on 85% of trials). In the second experiment, we estimated each participant's detection ratio of electrical stimuli (with a magnitude equivalent of their perceptual threshold) delivered at various time points before speaking and during a control condition (silent reading). Results We found that the overall detection ratio in the silent reading condition remained unchanged relative to the detection ratio at rest. Approximately 536 ms before speech onset, the detection ratio in the speaking condition was similar to that in the silent reading condition; however, the detection ratio in the speaking condition gradually started to decrease and reached its lowest level at 58 ms before speech onset. Conclusions Overall, we provided compelling behavioral evidence that, as the speech motor system prepares speech movements, it also modulates the orofacial somatosensory system in a temporally specific manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697611      PMCID: PMC7872732          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  53 in total

1.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw.

Authors:  S Shaiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vibration and muscle contraction affect somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  L G Cohen; A Starr
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Contributions of sensory tuning to auditory-vocal interactions in marmoset auditory cortex.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Gating of sensation and evoked potentials following foot stimulation during human gait.

Authors:  J Duysens; A A Tax; S Nawijn; W Berger; T Prokop; E Altenmüller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Modulation of sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials during stance and different phases of the step-cycle.

Authors:  E Altenmüller; W Berger; T Prokop; M Trippel; V Dietz
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11

8.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.

Authors:  J A Kelso; B Tuller; E Vatikiotis-Bateson; C A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Subject's own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  J Numminen; R Salmelin; R Hari
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-04-16       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  The self in social interactions: sensory attenuation of auditory action effects is stronger in interactions with others.

Authors:  Carmen Weiss; Arvid Herwig; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Computational Model for Estimating the Speech Motor System's Sensitivity to Auditory Prediction Errors.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.