Literature DB >> 26243743

Identification of genotoxic compounds using isogenic DNA repair deficient DT40 cell lines on a quantitative high throughput screening platform.

Kana Nishihara1, Ruili Huang2, Jinghua Zhao2, Sampada A Shahane2, Kristine L Witt3, Stephanie L Smith-Roe3, Raymond R Tice3, Shunichi Takeda4, Menghang Xia5.   

Abstract

DNA repair pathways play a critical role in maintaining cellular homeostasis by repairing DNA damage induced by endogenous processes and xenobiotics, including environmental chemicals. Induction of DNA damage may lead to genomic instability, disruption of cellular homeostasis and potentially tumours. Isogenic chicken DT40 B-lymphocyte cell lines deficient in DNA repair pathways can be used to identify genotoxic compounds and aid in characterising the nature of the induced DNA damage. As part of the US Tox21 program, we previously optimised several different DT40 isogenic clones on a high-throughput screening platform and confirmed the utility of this approach for detecting genotoxicants by measuring differential cytotoxicity in wild-type and DNA repair-deficient clones following chemical exposure. In the study reported here, we screened the Tox21 10K compound library against two isogenic DNA repair-deficient DT40 cell lines (KU70 (-/-) /RAD54 (-/-) and REV3 (-/-) ) and the wild-type cell line using a cell viability assay that measures intracellular adenosine triphosphate levels. KU70 and RAD54 are genes associated with DNA double-strand break repair processes, and REV3 is associated with translesion DNA synthesis pathways. Active compounds identified in the primary screening included many well-known genotoxicants (e.g. adriamycin, melphalan) and several compounds previously untested for genotoxicity. A subset of compounds was further evaluated by assessing their ability to induce micronuclei and phosphorylated H2AX. Using this comprehensive approach, three compounds with previously undefined genotoxicity-2-oxiranemethanamine, AD-67 and tetraphenylolethane glycidyl ether-were identified as genotoxic. These results demonstrate the utility of this approach for identifying and prioritising compounds that may damage DNA. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26243743      PMCID: PMC4723671          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  46 in total

1.  A protocol for the in vitro micronucleus test. I. Contributions to the development of a protocol suitable for regulatory submissions from an examination of 16 chemicals with different mechanisms of action and different levels of activity.

Authors:  Michael L Garriott; J Barry Phelps; Wherly P Hoffman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-05-27       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Type II topoisomerases--inhibitors, repair mechanisms and mutations.

Authors:  Peter Heisig
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Cellular-signaling pathways unveil the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.

Authors:  Giel Hendriks; Bob van de Water; Willem Schoonen; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.446

4.  Comparison of the mutagenic activity of 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine with 5-substituted 2'-deoxyuridine analogs in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.

Authors:  M H Bilimoria; S V Gupta
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  The relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol eta, Pol zeta, Rev1 protein and Pol32 in the bypass and mutation induction of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer.

Authors:  Peter E M Gibbs; John McDonald; Roger Woodgate; Christopher W Lawrence
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Salmonella mutagenicity tests: V. Results from the testing of 311 chemicals.

Authors:  E Zeiger; B Anderson; S Haworth; T Lawlor; K Mortelmans
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress.

Authors:  Shan Yan; Melanie Sorrell; Zachary Berman
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Helleday; Eva Petermann; Cecilia Lundin; Ben Hodgson; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  GammaH2AX and cancer.

Authors:  William M Bonner; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Sedelnikova; Stéphanie Solier; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Junko Murai; Shar-yin N Huang; Benu Brata Das; Amelie Renaud; Yiping Zhang; James H Doroshow; Jiuping Ji; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 13.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Assessment of the DNA damaging potential of environmental chemicals using a quantitative high-throughput screening approach to measure p53 activation.

Authors:  Kristine L Witt; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Jinghua Zhao; Scott S Auerbach; Junguk Hur; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Kristine L Witt; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Ruili Huang; Alexander Sedykh; Keith R Shockley; Scott S Auerbach; B Alex Merrick; Menghang Xia; Raymond R Tice; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging.

Authors:  Volkan Turan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

6.  Determination of Histone H2AX Phosphorylation in DT40 Cells.

Authors:  Kana Nishihara; Sampada A Shahane; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

7.  Next generation high throughput DNA damage detection platform for genotoxic compound screening.

Authors:  Peter Sykora; Kristine L Witt; Pooja Revanna; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Jonathan Dismukes; Donald G Lloyd; Bevin P Engelward; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The Next Generation of Risk Assessment Multi-Year Study-Highlights of Findings, Applications to Risk Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ila Cote; Melvin E Andersen; Gerald T Ankley; Stanley Barone; Linda S Birnbaum; Kim Boekelheide; Frederic Y Bois; Lyle D Burgoon; Weihsueh A Chiu; Douglas Crawford-Brown; Kevin M Crofton; Michael DeVito; Robert B Devlin; Stephen W Edwards; Kathryn Z Guyton; Dale Hattis; Richard S Judson; Derek Knight; Daniel Krewski; Jason Lambert; Elizabeth Anne Maull; Donna Mendrick; Gregory M Paoli; Chirag Jagdish Patel; Edward J Perkins; Gerald Poje; Christopher J Portier; Ivan Rusyn; Paul A Schulte; Anton Simeonov; Martyn T Smith; Kristina A Thayer; Russell S Thomas; Reuben Thomas; Raymond R Tice; John J Vandenberg; Daniel L Villeneuve; Scott Wesselkamper; Maurice Whelan; Christine Whittaker; Ronald White; Menghang Xia; Carole Yauk; Lauren Zeise; Jay Zhao; Robert S DeWoskin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Development of a shear stress-free microfluidic gradient generator capable of quantitatively analyzing single-cell morphology.

Authors:  David Barata; Giulia Spennati; Cristina Correia; Nelson Ribeiro; Björn Harink; Clemens van Blitterswijk; Pamela Habibovic; Sabine van Rijt
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.838

10.  Enhancing the sensitivity of the thymidine kinase assay by using DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelghany Ibrahim; Manabu Yasui; Liton Kumar Saha; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Masamitsu Honma; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.