Literature DB >> 29106658

Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Steven M Bryce1, Derek T Bernacki1, Stephanie L Smith-Roe2, Kristine L Witt2, Jeffrey C Bemis1, Stephen D Dertinger1.   

Abstract

The in vitro MultiFlow DNA Damage assay multiplexes p53, γH2AX, phospho-histone H3, and polyploidization biomarkers into 1 flow cytometric analysis (Bryce, S. M., Bernacki, D. T., Bemis, J. C., and Dertinger, S. D. (2016). Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57, 171-189). The work reported herein evaluated the generalizability of the method, as well as several data analytics strategies, to a range of chemical classes not studied previously. TK6 cells were exposed to each of 103 diverse chemicals, 86 of which were supplied by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and selected based upon responses in genetic damage assays conducted under the Tox21 program. Exposures occurred for 24 h over a range of concentrations, and cell aliquots were removed at 4 and 24 h for analysis. Multiplexed response data were evaluated using 3 machine learning models designed to predict genotoxic mode of action based on data from a training set of 85 previously studied chemicals. Of 54 chemicals with sufficient information to make an a priori call on genotoxic potential, the prediction models' accuracies were 79.6% (random forest), 88.9% (logistic regression), and 90.7% (artificial neural network). A majority vote ensemble of the 3 models provided 92.6% accuracy. Forty-nine NTP chemicals were not adequately tested (maximum concentration did not approach assay's cytotoxicity limit) and/or had insufficient conventional genotoxicity data to allow their genotoxic potential to be defined. For these chemicals MultiFlow data will be useful in future research and hypothesis testing. Collectively, the results suggest the MultiFlow assay and associated data analysis strategies are broadly generalizable, demonstrating high predictability when applied to new chemicals and classes of compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29106658      PMCID: PMC6059150          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  70 in total

1.  Assessment of the DNA damaging potential of environmental chemicals using a quantitative high-throughput screening approach to measure p53 activation.

Authors:  Kristine L Witt; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Jinghua Zhao; Scott S Auerbach; Junguk Hur; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Assessment of the in vitro γH2AX assay by High Content Screening as a novel genotoxicity test.

Authors:  Carolina Garcia-Canton; Arturo Anadon; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Thomas E Nielsen; Mads H Clausen
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  An ethanolic extract of black cohosh causes hematological changes but not estrogenic effects in female rodents.

Authors:  Minerva Mercado-Feliciano; Michelle C Cora; Kristine L Witt; Courtney A Granville; Milton R Hejtmancik; Laurene Fomby; Katherine A Knostman; Michael J Ryan; Retha Newbold; Cynthia Smith; Paul M Foster; Molly K Vallant; Matthew D Stout
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Resveratrol acts as a topoisomerase II poison in human glioma cells.

Authors:  Stefano Leone; Emiliano Basso; Fabio Polticelli; Renata Cozzi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  The clastogenic potential in vitro of pyrrolizidine alkaloids employing hepatocyte metabolism.

Authors:  L Müller; P Kasper; G Kaufmann
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Identification of genotoxic compounds using isogenic DNA repair deficient DT40 cell lines on a quantitative high throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Kana Nishihara; Ruili Huang; Jinghua Zhao; Sampada A Shahane; Kristine L Witt; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Raymond R Tice; Shunichi Takeda; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Effects of resveratrol on topoisomerase II-α activity: induction of micronuclei and inhibition of chromosome segregation in CHO-K1 cells.

Authors:  Emiliano Basso; Mario Fiore; Stefano Leone; Francesca Degrassi; Renata Cozzi
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  A comparative study of the aneugenic and polyploidy-inducing effects of fisetin and two model Aurora kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  P Gollapudi; L S Hasegawa; D A Eastmond
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.873

View more
  13 in total

1.  Aneugen Molecular Mechanism Assay: Proof-of-Concept With 27 Reference Chemicals.

Authors:  Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Authors:  Catrin Hasselgren; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Franck Atienzar; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Krista Dobo; Tatyana Doktorova; David Faulkner; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Markus Frericks; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Helga Gerets; Véronique Gervais; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Chandrika Moudgal; Wolfgang Muster; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaray Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Benoit Schilter; Ronald D Snyder; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Raymond R Tice; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Ruili Huang; Alexander Sedykh; Keith R Shockley; Scott S Auerbach; B Alex Merrick; Menghang Xia; Raymond R Tice; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  Biomarkers of DNA damage response improve in vitro micronucleus assays by revealing genotoxic mode of action and reducing the occurrence of irrelevant positive results.

Authors:  Svetlana Avlasevich; Tina Pellegrin; Manali Godse; Steven Bryce; Jeffrey Bemis; Peter Bajorski; Stephen Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  Genotoxicity evaluation of nitrosamine impurities using human TK6 cells transduced with cytochrome P450s.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Xiaobo He; Yuan Le; Xiaoqing Guo; Matthew S Bryant; Aisar H Atrakchi; Timothy J McGovern; Karen L Davis-Bruno; David A Keire; Robert H Heflich; Nan Mei
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.168

8.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Comparative Genotoxicity of TEMPO and 3 of Its Derivatives in Mouse Lymphoma Cells.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Ji-Eun Seo; Steven M Bryce; Jenna A Tan; Qiangen Wu; Stacey L Dial; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.