Literature DB >> 31195068

Genetic toxicology in silico protocol.

Catrin Hasselgren1, Ernst Ahlberg2, Yumi Akahori3, Alexander Amberg4, Lennart T Anger4, Franck Atienzar5, Scott Auerbach6, Lisa Beilke7, Phillip Bellion8, Romualdo Benigni9, Joel Bercu10, Ewan D Booth11, Dave Bower12, Alessandro Brigo13, Zoryana Cammerer14, Mark T D Cronin15, Ian Crooks16, Kevin P Cross12, Laura Custer17, Krista Dobo18, Tatyana Doktorova19, David Faulkner20, Kevin A Ford21, Marie C Fortin22, Markus Frericks23, Samantha E Gad-McDonald24, Nichola Gellatly25, Helga Gerets26, Véronique Gervais27, Susanne Glowienke28, Jacky Van Gompel29, James S Harvey30, Jedd Hillegass17, Masamitsu Honma31, Jui-Hua Hsieh32, Chia-Wen Hsu33, Tara S Barton-Maclaren34, Candice Johnson12, Robert Jolly35, David Jones36, Ray Kemper37, Michelle O Kenyon18, Naomi L Kruhlak33, Sunil A Kulkarni34, Klaus Kümmerer38, Penny Leavitt17, Scott Masten6, Scott Miller12, Chandrika Moudgal39, Wolfgang Muster13, Alexandre Paulino40, Elena Lo Piparo41, Mark Powley42, Donald P Quigley12, M Vijayaray Reddy42, Andrea-Nicole Richarz43, Benoit Schilter41, Ronald D Snyder44, Lidiya Stavitskaya33, Reinhard Stidl45, David T Szabo46, Andrew Teasdale47, Raymond R Tice48, Alejandra Trejo-Martin10, Anna Vuorinen8, Brian A Wall49, Pete Watts50, Angela T White30, Joerg Wichard51, Kristine L Witt6, Adam Woolley52, David Woolley52, Craig Zwickl53, Glenn J Myatt12.   

Abstract

In silico toxicology (IST) approaches to rapidly assess chemical hazard, and usage of such methods is increasing in all applications but especially for regulatory submissions, such as for assessing chemicals under REACH as well as the ICH M7 guideline for drug impurities. There are a number of obstacles to performing an IST assessment, including uncertainty in how such an assessment and associated expert review should be performed or what is fit for purpose, as well as a lack of confidence that the results will be accepted by colleagues, collaborators and regulatory authorities. To address this, a project to develop a series of IST protocols for different hazard endpoints has been initiated and this paper describes the genetic toxicity in silico (GIST) protocol. The protocol outlines a hazard assessment framework including key effects/mechanisms and their relationships to endpoints such as gene mutation and clastogenicity. IST models and data are reviewed that support the assessment of these effects/mechanisms along with defined approaches for combining the information and evaluating the confidence in the assessment. This protocol has been developed through a consortium of toxicologists, computational scientists, and regulatory scientists across several industries to support the implementation and acceptance of in silico approaches.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Q)SAR; Computational toxicology protocols; Expert alerts; Expert review; Genetic toxicology; In silico; In silico toxicology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31195068      PMCID: PMC7485926          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  70 in total

1.  Preface

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Summary of major conclusions.

Authors:  D J Kirkland; M Hayashi; J T MacGregor; L Müller; L M Schechtman; T Sofuni
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  TOXNET: an evolving web resource for toxicology and environmental health information.

Authors:  P Wexler
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Summary of major conclusions from the 5th IWGT, Basel, Switzerland, 17-19 August 2009.

Authors:  D J Kirkland; M Hayashi; D Jacobson-Kram; P Kasper; B Gollapudi; L Müller; Y Uno
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Validation of Transcriptomics-Based In Vitro Methods.

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Mireia Vilardell; Jiri Aubrecht; Aldert Piersma
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Kristine L Witt; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Mutagenic activity of 5 thiazole compounds in the Salmonella/microsome and mouse lymphoma TK+/- assays.

Authors:  T P Cameron; T J Hughes; P E Kirby; K A Palmer; V A Fung; V C Dunkel
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  In silico toxicology protocols.

Authors:  Glenn J Myatt; Ernst Ahlberg; Yumi Akahori; David Allen; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Aynur Aptula; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Ewan D Booth; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Natalie Burden; Zoryana Cammerer; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Laura Custer; Magdalena Dettwiler; Krista Dobo; Kevin A Ford; Marie C Fortin; Samantha E Gad-McDonald; Nichola Gellatly; Véronique Gervais; Kyle P Glover; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; Steve Gutsell; Barry Hardy; James S Harvey; Jedd Hillegass; Masamitsu Honma; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Chia-Wen Hsu; Kathy Hughes; Candice Johnson; Robert Jolly; David Jones; Ray Kemper; Michelle O Kenyon; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Sunil A Kulkarni; Klaus Kümmerer; Penny Leavitt; Bernhard Majer; Scott Masten; Scott Miller; Janet Moser; Moiz Mumtaz; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Tudor I Oprea; Grace Patlewicz; Alexandre Paulino; Elena Lo Piparo; Mark Powley; Donald P Quigley; M Vijayaraj Reddy; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Patricia Ruiz; Benoit Schilter; Rositsa Serafimova; Wendy Simpson; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodriguez; David T Szabo; Andrew Teasdale; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Anna Vuorinen; Brian A Wall; Pete Watts; Angela T White; Joerg Wichard; Kristine L Witt; Adam Woolley; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Catrin Hasselgren
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Kinetochore immunofluorescence in micronuclei: a rapid method for the in situ detection of aneuploidy and chromosome breakage in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  U G Hennig; N L Rudd; D I Hoar
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  11 in total

1.  Implementation of in silico toxicology protocols within a visual and interactive hazard assessment platform.

Authors:  Glenn J Myatt; Arianna Bassan; Dave Bower; Candice Johnson; Scott Miller; Manuela Pavan; Kevin P Cross
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Integrating publicly available information to screen potential candidates for chemical prioritization under the Toxic Substances Control Act: A proof of concept case study using genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Jeffry L Dean; Catherine F Gibbons; Richard S Judson; Nagalakshmi Keshava; Leora Vegosen; Todd M Martin; Prachi Pradeep; Anita Simha; Sarah H Warren; Maureen R Gwinn; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Implementation of In Silico Toxicology Protocols in Leadscope.

Authors:  Kevin Cross; Candice Johnson; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nigel Greene; Raymond Kemper; Marlene T Kim; Moiz Mumtaz; Tobias Noeske; Manuela Pavan; Julia Pletz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Markus Schaefer; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Joerg Wichard; Dominic Williams; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-09

5.  Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and In Silico Predictions.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Lennart T Anger; Romualdo Benigni; David Bower; Frank Bringezu; Kevin M Crofton; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Magdalena Dettwiler; Markus Frericks; Fjodor Melnikov; Scott Miller; David W Roberts; Diana Suarez-Rodriguez; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Elena Lo Piparo; Raymond R Tice; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

7.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

8.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs for predicting heart, kidney and lung toxicities.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Autumn Bernal; Mark T D Cronin; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Candice Johnson; Raymond Kemper; Moiz Mumtaz; Louise Neilson; Manuela Pavan; Amy Pointon; Julia Pletz; Patricia Ruiz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Reena Sandhu; Markus Schaefer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-13

Review 9.  In silico toxicology: From structure-activity relationships towards deep learning and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Jennifer Hemmerich; Gerhard F Ecker
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Toxicological testing of syringaresinol and enterolignans.

Authors:  Verena Kirsch; Tamara Bakuradze; Elke Richling
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.