Literature DB >> 31243984

Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays.

Jui-Hua Hsieh1, Stephanie L Smith-Roe2, Ruili Huang3, Alexander Sedykh4, Keith R Shockley5, Scott S Auerbach2, B Alex Merrick2, Menghang Xia3, Raymond R Tice6, Kristine L Witt2.   

Abstract

Genotoxicity is a critical component of a comprehensive toxicological profile. The Tox21 Program used five quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays measuring some aspect of DNA damage/repair to provide information on the genotoxic potential of over 10 000 compounds. Included were assays detecting activation of p53, increases in the DNA repair protein ATAD5, phosphorylation of H2AX, and enhanced cytotoxicity in DT40 cells deficient in DNA-repair proteins REV3 or KU70/RAD54. Each assay measures a distinct component of the DNA damage response signaling network; >70% of active compounds were detected in only one of the five assays. When qHTS results were compared with results from three standard genotoxicity assays (bacterial mutation, in vitro chromosomal aberration, and in vivo micronucleus), a maximum of 40% of known, direct-acting genotoxicants were active in one or more of the qHTS genotoxicity assays, indicating low sensitivity. This suggests that these qHTS assays cannot in their current form be used to replace traditional genotoxicity assays. However, despite the low sensitivity, ranking chemicals by potency of response in the qHTS assays revealed an enrichment for genotoxicants up to 12-fold compared with random selection, when allowing a 1% false positive rate. This finding indicates these qHTS assays can be used to prioritize chemicals for further investigation, allowing resources to focus on compounds most likely to induce genotoxic effects. To refine this prioritization process, models for predicting the genotoxicity potential of chemicals that were active in Tox21 genotoxicity assays were constructed using all Tox21 assay data, yielding a prediction accuracy up to 0.83. Data from qHTS assays related to stress-response pathway signaling (including genotoxicity) were the most informative for model construction. By using the results from qHTS genotoxicity assays, predictions from models based on qHTS data, and predictions from commercial bacterial mutagenicity QSAR models, we prioritized Tox21 chemicals for genotoxicity characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31243984      PMCID: PMC6740247          DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  40 in total

1.  Effects of double-strand break repair proteins on vertebrate telomere structure.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Rose Skopp; Minoru Takata; Shunichi Takeda; Carolyn M Price
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals.

Authors:  J McCann; E Choi; E Yamasaki; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The chicken B cell line DT40: a novel tool for gene disruption experiments.

Authors:  P Winding; M W Berchtold
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Micronucleated erythrocyte frequency in peripheral blood of B6C3F(1) mice from short-term, prechronic, and chronic studies of the NTP carcinogenesis bioassay program.

Authors:  K L Witt; A Knapton; C M Wehr; G J Hook; J Mirsalis; M D Shelby; J T MacGregor
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Multiple roles of vertebrate REV genes in DNA repair and recombination.

Authors:  Takashi Okada; Eiichiro Sonoda; Michio Yoshimura; Yoshiaki Kawano; Hideyuki Saya; Masaoki Kohzaki; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  The cyto- and genotoxicity of organotin compounds is dependent on the cellular uptake capability.

Authors:  E Dopp; L M Hartmann; U von Recklinghausen; A M Florea; S Rabieh; B Shokouhi; A V Hirner; G Obe; A W Rettenmeier
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Robert J Kavlock; Christopher P Austin; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  A phase I dose-escalation study of SR271425, an intravenously dosed thioxanthone analog, administered weekly in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  A Craig Lockhart; Emiliano Calvo; Anthony W Tolcher; Eric K Rowinsky; Gareth Shackleton; J Gilmour Morrison; Rezvan Rafi; Wendy VerMeulen; Mace L Rothenberg
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams.

Authors:  Tim Hulsen; Jacob de Vlieg; Wynand Alkema
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  9 in total

1.  Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  The expression of Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes in human B-lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Yuxi Li; Kylie G Ning; Si Chen; Lei Guo; Jessica A Bonzo; Nan Mei
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Development and Application of TK6-derived Cells Expressing Human Cytochrome P450s for Genotoxicity Testing.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Si Chen; Xiaoqing Guo; Qiangen Wu; Ji-Eun Seo; Lei Guo; Mugimane G Manjanatha; Tong Zhou; Kristine L Witt; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comprehensive interpretation of in vitro micronucleus test results for 292 chemicals: from hazard identification to risk assessment application.

Authors:  Byron Kuo; Marc A Beal; John W Wills; Paul A White; Francesco Marchetti; Andy Nong; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Keith Houck; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.168

5.  The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

Authors:  Alice Krebs; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; Tanja Waldmann; Wiebke Albrecht; Jan Boei; Bas Ter Braak; Maja Brajnik; Thomas Braunbeck; Tim Brecklinghaus; Francois Busquet; Andras Dinnyes; Joh Dokler; Xenia Dolde; Thomas E Exner; Ciarán Fisher; David Fluri; Anna Forsby; Jan G Hengstler; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Zofia Janstova; Paul Jennings; Jaffar Kisitu; Julianna Kobolak; Manoj Kumar; Alice Limonciel; Jessica Lundqvist; Balázs Mihalik; Wolfgang Moritz; Giorgia Pallocca; Andrea Paola Cediel Ulloa; Manuel Pastor; Costanza Rovida; Ugis Sarkans; Johannes P Schimming; Bela Z Schmidt; Regina Stöber; Tobias Strassfeld; Bob van de Water; Anja Wilmes; Bart van der Burg; Catherine M Verfaillie; Rebecca von Hellfeld; Harry Vrieling; Nanette G Vrijenhoek; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.

Authors:  Federica Madia; David Kirkland; Takeshi Morita; Paul White; David Asturiol; Raffaella Corvi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Repurposing drugs as COVID-19 therapies: A toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  Deborah K Ngan; Tuan Xu; Menghang Xia; Wei Zheng; Ruili Huang
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 8.369

8.  Enhancing the sensitivity of the thymidine kinase assay by using DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelghany Ibrahim; Manabu Yasui; Liton Kumar Saha; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Masamitsu Honma; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Transcriptomic analyses of livers from mice exposed to 1,4-dioxane for up to 90 days to assess potential mode(s) of action underlying liver tumor development.

Authors:  G A Chappell; M M Heintz; L C Haws
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.