Literature DB >> 28679277

Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.

Joseph G Desloge1, Charlotte M Reed1, Louis D Braida1, Zachary D Perez1, Laura A D'Aquila1.   

Abstract

The masking release (i.e., better speech recognition in fluctuating compared to continuous noise backgrounds) observed for normal-hearing (NH) listeners is generally reduced or absent in hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. One explanation for this lies in the effects of reduced audibility: elevated thresholds may prevent HI listeners from taking advantage of signals available to NH listeners during the dips of temporally fluctuating noise where the interference is relatively weak. This hypothesis was addressed through the development of a signal-processing technique designed to increase the audibility of speech during dips in interrupted noise. This technique acts to (i) compare short-term and long-term estimates of energy, (ii) increase the level of short-term segments whose energy is below the average energy, and (iii) normalize the overall energy of the processed signal to be equivalent to that of the original long-term estimate. Evaluations of this energy-equalizing (EEQ) technique included consonant identification and sentence reception in backgrounds of continuous and regularly interrupted noise. For HI listeners, performance was generally similar for processed and unprocessed signals in continuous noise; however, superior performance for EEQ processing was observed in certain regularly interrupted noise backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679277      PMCID: PMC5552388          DOI: 10.1121/1.4985186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Coherence and the speech intelligibility index.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.

Authors:  S De Gennaro; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1986-01

7.  Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  R P Lippmann; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  E Kennedy; H Levitt; A C Neuman; M Weiss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Audibility emphasis of low-level sounds improves consonant identification while preserving vowel identification for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.723

3.  High-resolution temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Tobias May; Borys Kowalewski; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.

Authors:  Borys Kowalewski; Johannes Zaar; Michal Fereczkowski; Ewen N MacDonald; Olaf Strelcyk; Tobias May; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.